banner

Regular Meeting - SRCS Board of Education
San Rafael City Schools
June 24, 2015 5:00PM
District Office - Boardroom 310 Nova Albion Way San Rafael, CA 94903

I. OPEN SESSION/ROLL CALL 5:00 PM
Quick Summary / Abstract:

Natu Tuatagaloa, Board President Rachel Kertz, Vice President Linda M. Jackson, Trustee Greg Knell, Trustee Maika Llorens Gulati

Minutes:
President Tuatagaloa opened the meeting at 5:14 PM.

Trustees present:
Natu Tuatagaloa
Rachel Kertz
Linda M. Jackson
Greg Knell
Maika Llorens Gulati
II. PUBLIC COMMENT on Closed Session
Minutes:
None.
III. CLOSED SESSION
Minutes:
Pursuant to Government Code sections 54957 and 54956.9, the Board adjourned to Closed Session at 5:15 PM.
III.1. GOV. CODE 54957: PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT (ESD/HSD): Chief Technology Officer; Assistant Superintendent, Education ServicesConfidential agenda item.
III.2. CLOSED SESSION: Gov. Code 54957 Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release (ESD-1 certificated) Confidential agenda item.
III.3. CLOSED SESSION: (ESD/HSD) Gov. Code 54956.9 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNCIL -ANTICIPATED LITIGATION (1 Case)Confidential agenda item.
IV. RETURN TO OPEN SESSION
Minutes:
President Tuatagaloa reconvened the meeting to Open Session at 6:05 PM.
V. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Minutes:
Molly O'Donoghue led the Pledge of Allegiance.
VI. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS (Public comment on items that appear on the agenda will be taken at the time the item is addressed by the Board.)
Minutes:
None.
VII. SPECIAL REPORT
VII.1. EDUCATION SERVICES: (ESD) California State Preschool Program Self Evaluation
Speaker:
Ana Becerra and Marisela Espinoza de Gomez
Quick Summary / Abstract:

The Board will hear a summary report of the Preschool Program Self Evaluation for acceptance.



Rationale:
Staff will present a summary of the annual California State Preschool Program Self Evaluation for Board Approval.
 
Financial Impact:
N/A
Minutes:
Accountability Coordinator Julia Neff and Ana Becerra, San Pedro site supervisor for the state preschool program, presented the annual report on the program.

Ms. Becerra outlined that the preschool programs at San Pedro and Bahia Vista are closely aligned with Kindergarten to build skills, confidence and drive, in preparation for Kindergarten. She reported an orientation of families is held in the fall at both sites. A development profile and individual assessment of each student is done twice a year. Parent/teacher conferences are held in October, parent surveys are done in the spring, and post-assessments are done of each child to check progress. The CDE DRDP (Desired Results Developmental Profile) provides an assessment of student performance and the preschool program in general. More funding will be provided to the district’s preschool program for the coming year because students performed so well this year. Data collected from the year is developed into an action plan.

Staff attend MCOE and district trainings; some are required trainings. They train and partner with Kindergarten teachers. They meet with student teachers and parents. GLAD strategies are implemented with students as well as Every Day Math and the state preschool program curriculum.
From the DRDP findings, Ms. Bercera described the move toward 4 stages of total building for skill development, closely related to language and emotional development. Ninety nine percent (99%) of students are non-English speakers at the beginning of the year; 98% of students are at the building stage at the end of the program.

Improvements for next year will be for greater parental participation at BV, with a goal of 75%. Ten parent education classes and child care will be available next year to increase family literacy.



Ms. Becerra responded to trustee questions regarding the program: it is at capacity, with a waiting list for both sites’ morning and afternoon programs - 32 children at SP and 30 at BV; staff are required to have child development degrees as required by licensing; the curriculum for the program comes from the state.
Marisela Espinoza de Gomez, preschool site supervisor for Bahia Vista acknowledged Ms. Becerra for her support.
Ms. Becerra noted that state preschool representatives visited the district's program this year and acknowledged staff for the great job they are doing. Efforts to increase the program in the district, have so far been unsuccessful, as it is a competitive grant process. Trustee Jackson inquired about the possibility of the MCF initiative funding an expansion. Dr. Watenpaugh noted Marin Strong Start’s focus on early childhood education is an initiative that could provide support.
Attachments:
2014-2015 CSPP Self Evaluation
VIII. CONSENT AGENDA: (All items appearing on the Consent Agenda are approved in one action by the Board. Trustees, staff or members of the public may request that an item be pulled for discussion prior to Consent Agenda approval.)
Minutes:
President Tuatagaloa requested that each consent agenda item be discussed and voted on individually.
VIII.1. PERSONNEL (HSD): Approval of High School District Personnel, Certificated/Classified
Quick Summary / Abstract:

This agenda item presents for Board approval the Administration's recommended personnel transactions for the High School District.

Rationale:

This agenda item presents for Board approval the Administration's recommended personnel transactions for the High School district, as shown on Exhibit A (Certificated) and Exhibit B (Classified).

All changes to personnel since the previous board meeting including resignations, leaves of absence, retirements, reassignments, new hires, changes of contract, returns from leave, releases and short term assignments are included for Board approval.

 
Recommended Motion:

Approval of all hiring, terminations, transfers, and retirements of employees in the High School District.

Actions:
Motion

Approval of all hiring, terminations, transfers, and retirements of employees in the High School District, as revised.

Passed with a motion by Linda Jackson and a second by Greg Knell.
Vote:
Yes Linda Jackson.
Yes Rachel Kertz.
Yes Greg Knell.
Yes Ms. Maika Llorens Gulati.
Yes Natu Tuatagaloa.
Minutes:
President Tuatagaloa noted that the High School District Personnel Action report was revised after the agenda was posted.
Attachments:
HSD Personnel Actions - REV
VIII.2. PERSONNEL (JOINT): Approval of Joint School District Personnel, Certificated/Classified
Quick Summary / Abstract:

This agenda item presents for Board approval the Administration's recommended personnel transactions for the Joint School District.

Rationale:

This agenda item presents for Board approval the Administration's recommended personnel transactions for the Joint School District, as shown on Exhibit A (Certificated) and Exhibit B (Classified).

All changes to personnel since the previous board meeting including resignations, leaves of absence, retirements, reassignments, new hires, changes of contract, returns from leave, releases and short term assignments are included for Board approval.  

 
Recommended Motion:

Approval of all hiring, terminations, transfers, and retirements of employees in the Joint School District.

Actions:
Motion

Approval of all hiring, terminations, transfers, and retirements of employees in the Joint School District.

Passed with a motion by Rachel Kertz and a second by Greg Knell.
Vote:
Yes Linda Jackson.
Yes Rachel Kertz.
Yes Greg Knell.
Yes Ms. Maika Llorens Gulati.
Yes Natu Tuatagaloa.
Minutes:
President Tuatagaloa noted that the Joint District Personnel Action report was revised after the agenda was posted.
Attachments:
Joint Personnel Actions REV
VIII.3. EDUCATION SERVICES: (ESD) Approval of Elementary District Consolidated Application for Funding Categorical Aid Programs, 15-16.
Speaker:
Julia Neff
Quick Summary / Abstract:

The Board will review this application for funds for recommended approval. 


Rationale:

The San Rafael City Elementary District receives categorical funds from the State and Federal governments for supplemental educational programs. The district must annually submit an application for State and Federal Funding. The application for Federal programs covers Title I (disadvantaged children), Title II, Part A (teacher and principal training), and Title III (Immigrant and Limited English Proficient funds). The State programs include Economic Impact Aid (EIA) for English learners (carryover only).

The District utilizes a portion of categorical fund dollars to supplement programs and services to students, especially in the areas of math, reading, language arts, and English Language development. All funds will be used for identified students and/or the specified purpose and all compliance requirements will be fully met. Staff development, parent education and participation, guidance, evaluation, assessment and planning are also required elements of the program.

Schools qualify for Title I funding by meeting the requirement of a percentage unique to each district of students eligible for free and reduced lunches. The schools meeting the requirements for Title I funding are Bahia Vista, Coleman, Laurel Dell, San Pedro and Short Elementary Schools, Davidson Middle School and Venetia Valley K-8 School. Saint Raphael School has requested to participate in Title I, Title II, and Title III funding. Brandeis Hillel has requested to participate in Title II funding.

Students will be identified for Title I academic assistance in grades 2-8 by performing below grade level based upon district and school assessments. Teachers will identify students in grades K-1 who are performing significantly below grade level according to the criteria identified in the district K-1 Assessment.

The application has been reformatted for online completion and submission with restricted access. As a result, the ability to present the preliminary or completed application in digital form has become limited. The board will be  presented with a hard copy at he board meeting of the preliminary or completed application for review for the purposes of approving the application for funds. 



 
Financial Impact:

The Consolidated Application declares the District's intent to apply for categorical funding. The District expects to receive allocations in the following categorical funds:

Title I, Part A - Basic Grant

    Title II, Part A - Teacher Quality

Title III, Part A - Immigrant

    Title III, Part A - Limited English Proficient (LEP)

Recommended Motion:

Approval of the ESD consolidated application for funds.

Actions:
Motion

Approval of the ESD consolidated application for funds.

Passed with a motion by Greg Knell and a second by Linda Jackson.
Vote:
Yes Linda Jackson.
Yes Rachel Kertz.
Yes Greg Knell.
Yes Ms. Maika Llorens Gulati.
Yes Natu Tuatagaloa.
Minutes:
Dr. MacLean reviewed this application is a mandated compliance requirement for continued funding for remaining categorical state funding for dedicated populations.
Comments:


Attachments:
ESD Consolidated Application
VIII.4. EDUCATION SERVICES: (HSD) Approval of High School District Consolidated Application for Funding Categorical Aid Programs, 2015-2016
Speaker:
Julia Neff
Quick Summary / Abstract:

This agenda item presents for Board approval the High School Districts' Consolidated Application for Funding Categorical Aid Programs, 2015-2016.

 




Rationale:

The San Rafael City High School District receives categorical funds from the State and Federal governments for supplemental educational programs. The District must annually submit an application for State and Federal Funding. The application for Federal programs covers Title I (disadvantaged children), Title II, Part A (teacher and principal training), and Title III (Immigrant and Limited English Proficient funds). The State programs include Economic Impact Aid (EIA) for English learners (carryover only).

The District will use many of the categorical fund dollars to supplement programs and services to students, especially in the areas of math, reading, language arts, and English language development. All funds will be used for identified students and/or its specified purpose and all compliance requirements will be fully met. Staff development, parent education and participation, guidance, evaluation, assessment, and planning are also required elements of the program.

Schools qualify for Title I funding by meeting the requirement of a percentage unique to each district of students eligible for free and reduced lunches. The schools meeting the requirements for Title I funding are Madrone and San Rafael High School.

Students will be identified for Title I academic help in grades 9-12 by performing below grade level expectations. Specific support services are identified for students in grades 10-12 who have not yet passed the high school exit exam.

The application has been reformatted for online completion and submission with restricted access. As a result, the ability to present the preliminary or completed application in digital form has become limited. The board will be presented with a hard copy at the board meeting of the preliminary or completed application for review for the purposes of approving the application for funds. 






 
Financial Impact:

The Consolidated Application declares the District's intent to apply for categorical funding. The District expects to receive allocations in the following categorical:

Title I, Part A - Basic Grant

    Title II, Part A - Teacher Quality

Title III, Part A - Immigrant

    Title III, Part A - Limited English Proficient (LEP) Students

Recommended Motion:

Approval of the HSD consolidated application for funds.

Actions:
Motion

Approval of the HSD consolidated application for funds.

Passed with a motion by Greg Knell and a second by Rachel Kertz.
Vote:
Yes Linda Jackson.
Yes Rachel Kertz.
Yes Greg Knell.
Yes Ms. Maika Llorens Gulati.
Yes Natu Tuatagaloa.
Attachments:
HSD Consolidated Application
VIII.5. SECOND READING: FINANCE: (ESD/HSD) Adoption of Revisions to Board Policy and Administrative Regulation 3260 Fees and Charges
Quick Summary / Abstract:

The Board will review the final revisions to BP and AR 3260 Fees and Charges for recommended approval.



Rationale:

BACKGROUND: San Rafael City Schools Board Policy 9310 Section 1.4 states:

"The Board recognizes the importance of maintaining a policy manual that is up to date and reflects the mandates of law. Policies shall be regularly reviewed at a time allocated for this purpose on the agenda of public Board meetings."

It is the responsibility of administration to periodically review and update policies and regulations. In December of 2008, the entire Board Policy Manual was updated, with revisions and updates bringing it into compliance with current Education Code, State and Federal requirements. The policy was updated again in April of 2014 to more accurately reflect new Title 5 Regulation..

Revisions to Board Policy Administrative Regulation 3260 Fees and Charges policy include mandated changes in accordance with the new regulation which addresses remedies to be provided to all affected students and parents/guardians if the district is found in violation of the prohibition against unauthorized student fees. Policy also clarifies that the prohibition against student fees does not restrict districts from soliciting for voluntary donations, participating in fundraising activities, or providing prizes of other recognition for participants in such fundraising events.

The regulation was updated to expand and clarify the lost of permissible fees and align materials with California Department of Education Fiscal Management Advisories.



 
Financial Impact:

None

Recommended Motion:

Approval of the revisions to BP and AR 3260 Fees and Charges. 


Actions:
Motion

Approval of the revisions to BP and AR 3260 Fees and Charges. 


Passed with a motion by Greg Knell and a second by Linda Jackson.
Vote:
Yes Linda Jackson.
Yes Rachel Kertz.
Yes Greg Knell.
Yes Ms. Maika Llorens Gulati.
Yes Natu Tuatagaloa.
Minutes:
Ms. Thomas reviewed these changes reflect mostly technical revisions.
Attachments:
3260 AR Fees and Charges
3260 BP Fees and Charges
VIII.6. SECOND READING: FINANCE: (ESD/HSD) Adoption of Revisions to Administrative Regulation 3554 Other Food Sales
Quick Summary / Abstract:

The Board will review the final revisions to AR 3554 Other Food Sales. 


Rationale:

BACKGROUND: San Rafael City Schools Board Policy 9310 Section 1.4 states:

"The Board recognizes the importance of maintaining a policy manual that is up to date and reflects the mandates of law. Policies shall be regularly reviewed at a time allocated for this purpose on the agenda of public Board meetings."

It is the responsibility of administration to periodically review and update policies and regulations. In December of 2008, the entire Board Policy Manual was updated, with revisions and updates bringing it into compliance with current Education Code, State and Federal requirements. The policy was updated in December 2013  to reflect new law (AB 626) and new federal regulation (78 Fed. Reg. 125). The policy was updated again in January of 2015 to more accurately reflect 7 CFR 210.11.

Revisions to Administrative Regulation 3554 Other Food Sales policy include mandated changes in accordance with the rules and regulations to control sale of foods in competition with the program and to prohibit sale of food of minimal nutritional value.




 
Financial Impact:

None

Recommended Motion:
Approval of the adoption of proposed revisions.


Actions:
Motion
Approval of the adoption of proposed revisions.


Passed with a motion by Greg Knell and a second by Rachel Kertz.
Vote:
Yes Linda Jackson.
Yes Rachel Kertz.
Yes Greg Knell.
Yes Ms. Maika Llorens Gulati.
Yes Natu Tuatagaloa.
Minutes:
Ms. Thomas reviewed that these changes are mostly technical revisions needed for compliance with federal nutritional guidelines. She noted ASB and parent groups will now need to send notification to the Business Office for assurance they are meeting nutritional standards with any food sales during the instructional day. President Tuatagaloa requested outreach to the community to communicate the standards and expectations as outlined.
Attachments:
AR 3554 Other Food Sales
VIII.7. EDUCATION SERVICES (HSD) Approval of New Textbooks: Descubre 1 (Spanish Text Spanish 1 Course), Themes (French Text – AP French Language), Imagina Spanish Text
Quick Summary / Abstract:

This item presents for Board approval of new textbooks: Descubre 1, Themes and Imagina.



Rationale:

Background Information:  The Secondary Curriculum Advisory Council (SCAC) has reviewed and discussed new course proposals, revised and updated high school courses of study.  Schools are continuing the process of reviewing current course outlines and revising, as appropriate, to align with the Common Core and newly updated and/or new versions of textbooks. 

There has been a shift to ensure, whenever possible, that elective courses are designed to meet the UC requirements for approval on the A-G list. There has also been a shift to not only have schools agree on new courses and textbooks, but as appropriate, to also agree to implement the same textbook at all three schools. All courses and new textbook recommendations are Common Core aligned.


Textbooks:

  • New Textbook: Descubre 1, Spanish Text
    • SCAC Approved on May 28 , 2015
  • New Textbook: Themes, French Text
    • SCAC Approved on May 28 , 2015
  • New Textbook: Imagina, Spanish Text
    • SCAC Approved on May 28, 2015
 
Financial Impact:
The cost of instructional materials will be funded through a combination of school site budgets and state and district instructional materials budget.
Recommended Motion:

Approval of new textbooks: Descubre 1, Themes and Imagina.

Actions:
Motion

Approval of new textbooks: Descubre 1, Themes and Imagina.

Passed with a motion by Rachel Kertz and a second by Linda Jackson.
Vote:
Yes Linda Jackson.
Yes Rachel Kertz.
Yes Greg Knell.
Yes Ms. Maika Llorens Gulati.
Yes Natu Tuatagaloa.
IX. DISCUSSION/ACTION SESSION
IX.1. EDUCATION SERVICES:(ESD) Approval of the 2015-2018 Local Control Accountability Plan Update for the San Rafael Elementary School District
Quick Summary / Abstract:

This item presents for Board approval of the  2015-2018 Local Control Accountability Plan Update for the San Rafael Elementary School District.


Rationale:

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

The Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) and Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) together create a direct connection between student outcomes and fiscal expenditures. They were developed as a structure to put into local hands the challenging and essential work of designing a coherent, effective educational system based on measurable strategies and actions. Through a process of data analysis and consultation, districts work with the community to articulate a vision and set priorities.  

The LCAP is a critical part of what makes LCFF work to support student success. The funding formula for education made by LCFF was carefully constructed in order to support the goal of increased transparency and accountability. The development and sharing of the LCAP is how LCFF supports these goals.

The LCAP is first and foremost about creating a comprehensive plan that will guide how a district and its schools support student success. It is intended to be a document that is brief, easy to understand, and contains key information about how the District plans to act and spend funding to address state and local priorities for student success. Similar to a strategic plan, the emphasis is on creating a document that shares the story and context of how the District plans to achieve its mission and vision.

The LCAP must include LCFF funds received by a local educational agency and can include other funds if such information is helpful. Each LCAP is expected to include information about the goals, services, and spending plan that address the needs of all pupils and each targeted population of students.

Furthermore, the LCAP must reflect specific goals for school sites, which may be districtwide or called out by individual site. The LCAP does not replace existing site plans. Rather it is expected that the LCAP and site plans are aligned and that site level advisory groups are informed about and have been engaged in providing input to the development of the LCAP.

The LCFF and LCAP intentionally allow districts the flexibility and authority needed to serve students based on specific need and local context. The very structure of LCAP reinforces the idea that one size does not fit all.

CURRENT CONSIDERATION:

Beginning in 2014-15, the State Board of Education (SBE) adopted regulations that offer guiding principles as well as provide an LCAP template that Districts are required to use.

The LCAP must include district annual goals that are aligned to the eight state priorities and specific actions a district will take to ensure that academic performance improves. Student achievement goals will be based on the expectations of the Common Core State StandardsNext Generation Science Standards, and new California English Language Development Standards.

The SBE guidance states that the LCAP should be:

  • Simple: avoids duplication, jargon, and non-essential information
  • Transparent: demonstrates how LCFF funding supports student performance
  • Local: expects information to be highly contextual and support a local story
  • Performance-focused: emphasizes student performance outcomes and avoids compliance-oriented information

The LCAP contains three sections:

  1. Section 1 – Stakeholder Engagementasks for information about Stakeholder Engagement and how this has contributed to the development of the LCAP.
  2. Section 2 – Goals, Actions, Expenditures, and Progress Indicatorsdescribes goals for the LEA and school sites and explains how progress will be monitored; includes an Annual Update section.
  3. Section 3 – Use of Supplemental and Concentration Grant funds and Proportionality: describes how supplemental and concentration grant funds will be used districtwide to address the goals from Section 2 and justifies these expenditures as the most effective use of funds to meet the district’s goals for unduplicated pupils in the state and any local priority areas.

The LCAP must be structured around eight key state priorities:

  • Basic Services

Compliance with Williams requirements: appropriate teacher assignment, sufficient instructional materials, and facilities in good repair.

  • Implementation of the CCSS

Implementation of the academic content and performance standards adopted by SBE, including how the programs and services will enable English learners to access the common core academic content standards and the English Language Development standards.

  • Parental Engagement

Parental involvement, including efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each individual school site, and including how the school district will promote parental participation in programs for economically disadvantaged pupils, English learners, foster youth, and individuals with exceptional needs.

  • Student Achievement

Pupil achievement as measured by multiple indicators including, but not limited to, assessment data, college readiness, and language proficiency.

  • Student Engagement

Pupil engagement as measured by multiple indicators including, but not limited to, rates associated with attendance, chronic absenteeism, dropout (middle and high school), and high school graduation.

  • School Climate

School climate as measured by multiple indicators including, but not limited to, pupil suspension and expulsion rates as well as other local measures assessing safety and school connectedness.

  • Course Access

The extent to which pupils have access to, and are enrolled in, a broad course of study that includes core subject areas (i.e., English, mathematics, social science, science, visual and performing arts, health, physical education, career and technical education, etc.), including the programs and services developed and provided to economically disadvantaged pupils, English learners, foster youth, and individuals with exceptional needs.

  • Other Student Outcomes

Pupil outcomes, as available, in the subject areas comprising a broad course of study.

 
Financial Impact:

This board item presents for public review and comment the Preliminary Local Control Accountability Plan for the San Rafael Elementary School District. The plan includes a description of the LCAP community engagement and involvement process, goals, progress indicators chosen as metrics, a description of specific actions, services and related expenditures, and an Annual Update.

The District formed a Parent Advisory Council in January 2015 and conducted several meetings to gather community input.  The District also convened three Community Forums to review and gather input about the community’s priorities. On Monday, June 1, the District met with members of the Parent Advisory Committee (PAC) in order to collect required input and questions, which the Superintendent is required to respond to in writing, according to the regulations.

An overview and summary of the survey feedback and the community input will be presented at the meeting.  


Recommended Motion:

Approval of the 2015-2018 Local Control Accountability Plan Update for the San Rafael Elementary School District.



Actions:
Motion

Approval of the 2015-2018 Local Control Accountability Plan Update for the San Rafael Elementary School District.



Passed with a motion by Linda Jackson and a second by Greg Knell.
Vote:
Yes Linda Jackson.
Yes Rachel Kertz.
Yes Greg Knell.
Yes Ms. Maika Llorens Gulati.
Yes Natu Tuatagaloa.
Minutes:
President Tuatagaloa noted that the LCAP was reviewed at Monday's meeting, noting comments shared to begin LCAP meetings in August and when union representation can participate. He expressed a huge thanks to all who participated in the development of the LCAPs, with special thanks to Christina Perrino and Dan Zaich for their leadership in the process.
Attachments:
ESD LCAP
IX.2. EDUCATION SERVICES:(HSD) Approval of the 2015-2018 Local Control Accountability Plan Update for the San Rafael High School District
Quick Summary / Abstract:

This item presents for Board approval of the 2015-2018 Local Control Accountability Plan Update for the San Rafael High School District


Rationale:

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

The Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) and Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP) together create a direct connection between student outcomes and fiscal expenditures. They were developed as a structure to put into local hands the challenging and essential work of designing a coherent, effective educational system based on measurable strategies and actions. Through a process of data analysis and consultation, districts work with the community to articulate a vision and set priorities.  

The LCAP is a critical part of what makes LCFF work to support student success. The funding formula for education made by LCFF was carefully constructed in order to support the goal of increased transparency and accountability. The development and sharing of the LCAP is how LCFF supports these goals.

The LCAP is first and foremost about creating a comprehensive plan that will guide how a district and its schools support student success. It is intended to be a document that is brief, easy to understand, and contains key information about how the District plans to act and spend funding to address state and local priorities for student success. Similar to a strategic plan, the emphasis is on creating a document that shares the story and context of how the District plans to achieve its mission and vision.

The LCAP must include LCFF funds received by a local educational agency and can include other funds if such information is helpful. Each LCAP is expected to include information about the goals, services, and spending plan that address the needs of all pupils and each targeted population of students.

Furthermore, the LCAP must reflect specific goals for school sites, which may be districtwide or called out by individual site. The LCAP does not replace existing site plans. Rather it is expected that the LCAP and site plans are aligned and that site level advisory groups are informed about and have been engaged in providing input to the development of the LCAP.

The LCFF and LCAP intentionally allow districts the flexibility and authority needed to serve students based on specific need and local context. The very structure of LCAP reinforces the idea that one size does not fit all.

CURRENT CONSIDERATION:

Beginning in 2014-15, the State Board of Education (SBE) adopted regulations that offer guiding principles as well as provide an LCAP template that Districts are required to use.

The LCAP must include district annual goals that are aligned to the eight state priorities and specific actions a district will take to ensure that academic performance improves. Student achievement goals will be based on the expectations of the Common Core State StandardsNext Generation Science Standards, and new California English Language Development Standards.

The SBE guidance states that the LCAP should be:

  • Simple: avoids duplication, jargon, and non-essential information
  • Transparent: demonstrates how LCFF funding supports student performance
  • Local: expects information to be highly contextual and support a local story
  • Performance-focused: emphasizes student performance outcomes and avoids compliance-oriented information

The LCAP contains three sections:

  1. Section 1 – Stakeholder Engagementasks for information about Stakeholder Engagement and how this has contributed to the development of the LCAP.
  2. Section 2 – Goals, Actions, Expenditures, and Progress Indicatorsdescribes goals for the LEA and school sites and explains how progress will be monitored; includes an Annual Update section.
  3. Section 3 – Use of Supplemental and Concentration Grant funds and Proportionality: describes how supplemental and concentration grant funds will be used districtwide to address the goals from Section 2 and justifies these expenditures as the most effective use of funds to meet the district’s goals for unduplicated pupils in the state and any local priority areas.

The LCAP must be structured around eight key state priorities:

  • Basic Services

Compliance with Williams requirements: appropriate teacher assignment, sufficient instructional materials, and facilities in good repair.

  • Implementation of the CCSS

Implementation of the academic content and performance standards adopted by SBE, including how the programs and services will enable English learners to access the common core academic content standards and the English Language Development standards.

  • Parental Engagement

Parental involvement, including efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each individual school site, and including how the school district will promote parental participation in programs for economically disadvantaged pupils, English learners, foster youth, and individuals with exceptional needs.

  • Student Achievement

Pupil achievement as measured by multiple indicators including, but not limited to, assessment data, college readiness, and language proficiency.

  • Student Engagement

Pupil engagement as measured by multiple indicators including, but not limited to, rates associated with attendance, chronic absenteeism, dropout (middle and high school), and high school graduation.

  • School Climate

School climate as measured by multiple indicators including, but not limited to, pupil suspension and expulsion rates as well as other local measures assessing safety and school connectedness.

  • Course Access

The extent to which pupils have access to, and are enrolled in, a broad course of study that includes core subject areas (i.e., English, mathematics, social science, science, visual and performing arts, health, physical education, career and technical education, etc.), including the programs and services developed and provided to economically disadvantaged pupils, English learners, foster youth, and individuals with exceptional needs.

  • Other Student Outcomes

Pupil outcomes, as available, in the subject areas comprising a broad course of study.


 
Financial Impact:

This board item presents for public review and comment the Preliminary Local Control Accountability Plan for the San Rafael Elementary School District. The plan includes a description of the LCAP community engagement and involvement process, goals, progress indicators chosen as metrics, a description of specific actions, services and related expenditures, and an Annual Update.

The District formed a Parent Advisory Council in January 2015 and conducted several meetings to gather community input.  The District also convened three Community Forums to review and gather input about the community’s priorities. On Monday, June 1, the District met with members of the Parent Advisory Committee (PAC) in order to collect required input and questions, which the Superintendent is required to respond to in writing, according to the regulations.

An overview and summary of the survey feedback and the community input will be presented at the meeting.  


Recommended Motion:

Approval of the 2015-2018 Local Control Accountability Plan Update for the San Rafael High School District

Actions:
Motion

Approval of the 2015-2018 Local Control Accountability Plan Update for the San Rafael High School District

Passed with a motion by Rachel Kertz and a second by Ms. Maika Llorens Gulati.
Vote:
Yes Linda Jackson.
Yes Rachel Kertz.
Yes Greg Knell.
Yes Ms. Maika Llorens Gulati.
Yes Natu Tuatagaloa.
Minutes:
It was noted that San Rafael City Schools is one of three districts in the state that have to complete two LCAPs for approval.
Attachments:
HSD LCAP
IX.3. FINANCE: (ESD) Approval of the San Rafael City Elementary School District Adopted Budget for the 2015-16 Fiscal Year and Approval of Budget Revision #4 for 2014-15 Was edited within 72 hours of the Meeting
Quick Summary / Abstract:

The Board is presented wtih the ESD budget for the 2015-16 fiscal years for recommended adoption and approval of  budget revision #4 for 2014-15.




Rationale:

BACKGROUND:      

The District is required to adopt a budget for all funds prior to June 30th each year.  This action must be taken after the Board has held a “public hearing”, which provides the public with an opportunity to comment on the budget. Under the State regulations for the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) and the Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), the Public Hearing on the budget and the LCAP must happen at a public Board meeting prior to the meeting in which the Budget and the LCAP will be presented to the Board for formal approval.  In compliance with the Education Code and the Brown Act, the District must provide notice of the Public Hearing 10 days prior to the Board Meeting, and the budget must be available for review 72 hours in advance.  The District provided the appropriate notice and the budget was available for review on Thursday, June 18, 2015.  The public hearing on the Budget was held on June 22, 2015.

The Budget Advisory Committee was convened in October 2014 and has met monthly through May 21st of this year.  This committee reviewed information on various sources of District revenues, types of expenditures, contractual or mandated obligations and expenditures outside of the control of the District (e.g. utilities, insurance and payroll driven costs) as well as discussing the potential implications of the new Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) and the new Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) that was adopted by the State in July 2013.

The process for the annual update of the new Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) started in January with the State making numerous revisions to the format for the LCAP until the final version was released in December.  Staff began working on Year 0 (2014-15 annual update of Section II of the LCAP over winter break). Once the new “revised” template was in place, the District started an inclusive process of community meetings and forums to provide information on the LCFF and the LCAP and collect feedback, specifically on the year two (2) (2014-15 LCAP) actions, services, and expenditures, as this would become the foundation for building Year 1 for the 2015-16 LCAP. Time was also spent refining the LCAP/District Goals from 9 to 5 goals and gathering input from the community.

In addition, the Parent Advisory Committee (PAC), as required by the State regulations, was established and began meeting in February.

The LCAP is a three-year plan with 3 sections; section 1, which describes the process of stakeholder engagement; section 2, which identifies the District Goals, Progress Indicators that include the needs that were identified and the metrics to measure progress toward addressing these needs.  It also describes the actions, services and expenditures ($$) for all three years to address the District defined goals as well as meeting all Eight State Priorities.  This year, Section II adds a new element identified as the “Annual Update” for year 0 in which the District provides information on what was actually accomplished and expended in the current year (2014-15) in support of the Goals from the prior year LCAP – Year 1. 

Section 3 specifically articulates how the needs of the target population (EL, Foster Youth, and Low Income Students) are met by providing increased or improved services over the base level of service for all students.  It also includes information on proportionality, in which the District must demonstrate that the funds included in the LCFF specifically generated by the Supplemental and Concentration grants are proportionate to the level of increased or improved services for EL/Low Income & Foster youth students. The funds generated by the supplemental and concentration grants (estimated at $4,738,752) cannot be used for base services including increases in salary and benefits. They must be used to increase or improve services for our target population of students whose ADA provides these supplemental funds through the LCFF. The 2015-18 LCAP reflects that the district is improving or increasing services for a total amount of $4,986,731 which exceeds the minimum proportionality by approximately $248,000

It is important to remember that this plan must be affordable and developed in compliance with the State regulations, which require the use of the template. In Section 2 of the LCAP, all of the Year 1 actions that are defined and that have a cost or specific expenditure associated with them, must be included in the District’s budget.

The assumptions, which include the expenditures identified in year 1 of section 2 of the LCAP and other major assumptions have been incorporated into the 2015-16 Budget and are attached for the upcoming school year. 

The following is a list of the various funds included in the Preliminary Budget, all of which are projected to have a positive ending fund balance: 

  • General Fund                                                                          $ 9,419,251
  • Child Development Fund 12                                                   $               0
  • Cafeteria Fund 13                                                                   $    136,826
  • Deferred Maintenance Fund 14                                              $    188,822
  • Special Reserve-Post Employee Benefit Fund 20                  $ 1,336,100
  • Building Fund 21                                                                     $           430
  • Capital Facilities Fund 25 (Developer Fees)                           $      23,246
  • Building Fund Prop 1A/SB50 Fund 35                                    $              0
  • Reserve for Capital Outlay Fund 40   (Facilities Use Fees)    $   549,721                                           
  • Debt Service Fund 51 (Pending information from Auditor-Controller’s Office)

 CURRENT CONSIDERATIONS:    

The Governor’s May Revise was not significantly different from the Governor’s January budget proposal for K-12 education in concept as there were no new programs added.  The Governor continued to support Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) as a key component of the State budget proposal with a large increase in the percentage of “GAP” funding @ 53.08%.  The State COLA was reduced to 1.02% and there was new one-time funding to support the ongoing implementation of Common Core State Standards

(CCSS) and other important programs through a repayment of the old mandate backlog that the State owes to public schools.  This one-time funding is estimated to be $601 per ADA or approximately $2.6 million for the SRESD. 

For more detailed information on the Governor’s May Revise, see The Marin Common Message – Executive Summary issued by the Marin County Office of Education attached.

Within this dynamic and ever-changing fiscal environment, staff continue to work to identify changes or modifications in information both from the State and Federal governments that will then be incorporated into the budget during the 1st budget revision being brought to the Board in the fall.

There were minor changes included in the budget based on new accounting information released from the State.  However, there are no significant changes to the Ending Fund Balance.  As the Adopted Budget and multi-year projections indicates, based on the assumptions included in the Governor’s May Revise, the San Rafael City Elementary School District will be able to meet its financial obligations for the current year and two subsequent fiscal years.  This agenda item presents the Adopted Budget to the Board for review and approval and in support of the LCAP for the 2015-16 Fiscal Year.

DISTRICT REPORTS:

  • Narrative
  • Budget Assumptions
  • 2015-16 Budget Adoption Reserves Document
  • Pie-charts & Bar-graphs
  • Comparative Spreadsheets
  • Enrollment and ADA Projections

 STATE REPORTS:

  • Budget Certifications
  • Workers Compensation Certification
  • Table of Contents
  • General Fund 01 Unrestricted and Restricted
  • Fund forms for All Other Funds
  • Average Daily Attendance
  • Multi-year Projections Schedule of Capital Assets
  • Schedule of Long-Term Liabilities
  • Cash Flow Schedule
  • Summary of Interfund Activities (Budget & Actuals to Date)
  • Lottery Report
  • Criteria & Standards for the General Fund 01
  • Current Expense Formula (Form CEB/CEA)
  • Technical Review Checklists (2015-16 Budget and 2014-15 Estimated Actuals)

 In addition, staff is recommending the final Budget Revision #4 for the 2014-15 fiscal year that includes minor changes from Budget Revision #3 (approved by the Board on June 8th) and adjusts various SACS accounts to ensure compliance with the State SACS software and avoid exceptions in the SACS Technical Review (TRC).



 
Financial Impact:

COST/FUNDING SOURCE: In compliance with GASB 54, the components of the ending fund balance are follows:

     Non-spendable

    Revolving Cash                                               $       2,500

            Stores Inventory                                              $              0

            Prepaid Expenditures                                      $              0

    Restricted                                                               $              1

    Committed                                                              $              0

    Assigned (Board Designated)

    Contingency for Cash Flow                             $ 1,100,000 

    Contingency CCSS & SB Assessments          $ 1,300,000

    Unassigned/Unappropriated

    Reserve for Economic Uncertainties                $ 2,461,987  5% Reserve

    Available Balance over Reserves                     $ 4,554,763

      Total Ending Fund Balance                               $9,419,250


         

Recommended Motion:

Adoption of the Elementary District budget for the 2015-16 fiscal years and approval of budget revision #4 for 2014-15.




Actions:
Motion

Adoption of the Elementary District budget for the 2015-16 fiscal years and approval of budget revision #4 for 2014-15.




Passed with a motion by Linda Jackson and a second by Greg Knell.
Vote:
Yes Linda Jackson.
Yes Rachel Kertz.
Yes Greg Knell.
Yes Ms. Maika Llorens Gulati.
Yes Natu Tuatagaloa.
Minutes:
President Tuatagaloa noted the ESD budget was presented on Monday night to the Board.
Attachments:
1 ESD Narrative and Budget Assumptions
10 ESD Multiyear Projections
11 ESD Criteria and Standards
12 ESD Pie Charts
13 ESD Fingertip Facts
14 ESD The Annual Budget Process
15 ESD Proposition 98 Crib Sheet
16 The Marin Commmon Message
2 ESD Budget Adoption Reserves
3 ESD Comparative Spreadhseets
4 ESD Enrollment Projections
5 ESD ADA
6 ESD School District Certification
7 ESD Worker's Compensation Certification
8 ESD Table of Contents
9 ESD General Fund
IX.4. FINANCE: (HSD) Approval of the San Rafael City High School Adopted Budget for the 2015-16 Fiscal Year and Approval of Budget Revision #4 for 2014-15Was edited within 72 hours of the Meeting
Quick Summary / Abstract:

That the Board reviews the HSD budget for the 2015-16 fiscal year and Budget Revision #4 for 2014-15, for recommended approval.





Rationale:

BACKGROUND:      

The District is required to adopt a budget for all funds prior to June 30th each year.  This action must be taken after the Board has held a “public hearing”, which provides the public with an opportunity to comment on the budget. Under the State regulations for the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) and the Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP), the Public Hearing on the budget and the LCAP must happen at a public Board meeting prior to the meeting in which the Budget and the LCAP will be presented to the Board for formal approval.  In compliance with the Education Code and the Brown Act, the District must provide notice of the Public Hearing 10 days prior to the Board Meeting, and the budget must be available for review 72 hours in advance.  The District provided the appropriate notice and the budget was available for review on Thursday, June 18, 2015.  The public hearing on the Budget was held on June 22, 2015.

The Budget Advisory Committee was convened in October 2014 and has met monthly through May 20th of this year.  This committee reviewed information on various sources of District revenues, types of expenditures, contractual or mandated obligations and expenditures outside of the control of the District (e.g. utilities, insurance and payroll driven costs) as well as discussing the potential implications of the new Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) and the new Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) that was adopted by the State in July 2013.  Although the San Rafael City High School District is a “Basic Aid” District, primarily funded by local property taxes and as such, receiving little or no funding from the State, the District is still subject to all of the requirements and obligations for the LCAP.

The process for the annual update of the new Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) started in January with the State making numerous revisions to the format for the LCAP until the final version was released in December.  Staff began working on Year 0 (2014-15 annual update of Section II of the LCAP over winter break). Once the new “revised” template was in place, the District started an inclusive process of community meetings and forums to provide information on the LCFF and the LCAP and collect feedback, specifically on the year two (2) (2014-15 LCAP) actions, services, and expenditures, as this would become the foundation for building Year 1 for the 2015-16 LCAP Update. Time was also spent refining the LCAP/District Goals from 9 to 5 goals and gathering input from the community.

In addition, the Parent Advisory Committee (PAC), as required by the State regulations, was established and began meeting in February.

The LCAP is a three-year plan with three sections; section 1, which describes the process of stake holder engagement; section 2, which identifies the District Goals and Progress Indicators that include the student needs and the metrics to measure progress toward addressing these needs.  It also describes the actions, services and expenditures ($$) for all three years to address the District defined goals as well as meeting all Eight State Priorities.  This year, Section II adds a new element identified as the “Annual Update” for year 0 in which the District provides information on what was actually accomplished and expended in the current year (2014-15) in support of the Goals from the prior year LCAP – Year 1. 

Section 3 specifically articulates how the needs of the target population (EL, Foster Youth, and Low Income Students) are met by providing increased or improved services over the base level of service for all students.  It also includes information on proportionality, in which the District must demonstrate that the funds included in the LCFF specifically generated by the Supplemental and Concentration grants are proportionate to the level of increased or improved services for EL/Low Income & Foster Youth students. The funds generated by the supplemental and concentration grants (estimated at $1,258,349) cannot be used for base services including increases in salary and benefits. They must be used to increase or improve services for our target population of students whose ADA provides these supplemental funds through the LCFF. The 2015-18 LCAP Update reflects that the district is improving or increasing services for our target population of students by a total amount of $1,721,300 which exceeds the minimum proportionality by approximately $483,000.

It is important to remember that this plan must be affordable and developed in compliance with State regulations, which require the use of the template. In Section 2 of the LCAP, all of the Year 1 actions that are defined and that have a cost or specific expenditure associated with them, must be included in the District’s budget.

The assumptions, which include the expenditures identified in Year 1 of Section 2 of the LCAP Update and other major assumptions have been incorporated into the 2015-16 Budget and are attached for the upcoming school year. 

The following is a list of the various funds included in the Adopted Budget, all of which are projected to have a positive ending fund balance: 

  • General Fund                                                                              $5,658,594
  • Adult Education Fund 11                                                            $   167,108
  • Cafeteria Fund 13                                                                       $     16,885
  • Deferred Maintenance Fund 14                                                  $   133,780
  • Special Reserve-Post Employee Benefit Fund 20                      $1,999,799
  • Building Fund 21                                                                         $1,455,241
  • Capital Facilities Fund 25 (Developer Fees)                               $   166,764
  • Special Reserve for Capital Improvements Fund 40(Prop 39)    $             0
  • Debt Service Fund 51 (Pending information from Auditor-Controller’s Office)

CURRENT CONSIDERATIONS:    

It is important to note that although the San Rafael High School District is a “basic aid” District and therefore not typically impacted significantly by State budget proposals, the LCFF calculations and the LCAP are still required even though there is no additional funding provided by the State.  It is also important to remember that over the past several years of State budget cuts, Basic Aid Districts were impacted by “fair-share” budget reductions from the State through the reduction and/or elimination of various State categorical programs. These fair-share reductions resulted in the loss of revenues of approximately $1.3 million annually and have not been restored by the LCFF even though these reductions were initially implemented as one-time.

Fortunately, the Marin County housing market is continuing to recover with local property tax estimates estimated to increase by approximately 6% for 2015-16.

While this is welcome news, the level of growth in student population continues to increase creating the need for 3-4.0 FTE teachers as well as other costs associated with educating more students.  That combined with the costs associated with significant STRS rate increases, the ongoing implementation of CCSS and Smarter Balanced Assessment tests, as well as developing the Year 1 actions to address the needs of our target “at-risk” population of students, is creating some fiscal challenges. Many of these Year 1 expenditures also help to ensure that the District can meet the proportionality requirements by demonstrating that the level of increased or improved services for EL/Low Income students is proportionate to the supplemental grant funds calculated by the LCFF ($1,258,349). They must be used to increase or improve services for our target population of students whose ADA provides these supplemental funds through the LCFF. The 2015-18 LCAP Update reflects that the district is improving or increasing services for a total amount of $1,731,200 which exceeds the minimum proportionality by approximately $473,000.

The Governor’s May Revise was not significantly different from the Governor’s January budget proposal for K-12 education in concept as there were no new programs added.  The Governor continued to support Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) as a key component of the State budget proposal with a large increase in the percentage of “GAP” funding @ 53.08%.  The State COLA was reduced to 1.02% and there was new one-time funding to support the ongoing implementation of Common Core State Standards (CCSS) and other important programs through a repayment of the old mandate backlog that the State owes to public schools.  This one-time funding is estimated to be $601 per ADA or approximately $1.35 million for the SRHSD. 

For more detailed information on the Governor’s May Revise, see The Marin Common Message – Executive Summary issued by the Marin County Office of Education, attached.

As a Basic Aid, and a “District of Choice” District, the San Rafael High School District can expect to receive a slight improvement in revenues from the State.  Although under the LCFF, there is no new revenue for Basic Aid Districts, who will continue to be funded primarily from local property taxes, the funds from the District of Choice program continue to be included for the District of Residence for the students on Inter-District Transfers. This results in approximately $390,000 in additional revenues annually.

For more detailed information on the Governor’s May Revise, see The Marin Common Message – Executive Summary issued by the Marin County Office of Education attached.

Within this dynamic and ever-changing fiscal environment, staff continue to work to identify changes or modifications in information both from the State and Federal governments that will then be incorporated into the budget during the 1st Budget Revision being brought to the Board in the fall.

There were minor changes included in the budget based on new accounting information released from the State.  However, there are no significant changes to the Ending Fund Balance.  As the Adopted Budget and multi-year projections indicate, based on the assumptions included in the Governor’s May Revise and local property tax estimates, the San Rafael City High School District will be able to meet its financial obligations for the current year and two subsequent fiscal years.

This agenda item presents the Adopted Budget to the Board for review and approval and in support of the LCAP for the 2015-16 Fiscal Year.

DISTRICT REPORTS:

  • Narrative
  • Budget Assumptions
  • 2015-16 Budget Adoption Reserves Document
  • Pie-charts & Bar-graphs
  • Comparative Spreadsheets
  • Enrollment and ADA Projections

    STATE REPORTS:

  • Budget Certifications
  • Workers Compensation Certification
  • Table of Contents
  • General Fund 01 Unrestricted and Restricted
  • Fund forms for All Other Funds
  • Average Daily Attendance
  • Multi-year Projections Schedule of Capital Assets
  • Schedule of Long-Term Liabilities
  • Cash Flow Schedule
  • Summary of Interfund Activities (Budget & Actuals to Date)
  • Lottery Report
  • Criteria & Standards for the General Fund 01
  • Current Expense Formula (Form CEB/CEA)
  • Technical Review Checklists (2015-16 Budget and 2014-15 Estimated Actuals)

In addition, staff is recommending the final Budget Revision #4 for the 2014-15 fiscal year that includes minor changes from Budget Revision #3 (approved by the Board on June 8th) and adjusts various SACS accounts to ensure compliance with the State SACS software and avoid exceptions in the SACS Technical Review (TRC).


 
Financial Impact:

COST/FUNDING SOURCE:  In compliance with GASB 54, the components of the ending fund balance are as follows:

    Non-spendable

    Revolving Cash                                              $       5,500

            Stores Inventory                                             $              0

            Prepaid Expenditures                                     $              0

    Restricted                                                              $              2

    Committed                                                             $              0

    Assigned (Board Designated)

    Contingency for Cash Flow                           $  1,100,000 

    Contingency CCSS & SB Assessments        $                0

    Unassigned/Unappropriated

    Reserve for Economic Uncertainties             $3,199,365 10% Reserve

    Available Balance over Reserves                  $1,353,729

      Total Ending Fund Balance                            $5,658,594  


Recommended Motion:

Adoption of the HSD budget for the 2015-16 fiscal year and approval of Budget Revision #4 for 2014-15.



Actions:
Motion

Adoption of the HSD budget for the 2015-16 fiscal year and approval of Budget Revision #4 for 2014-15.



Passed with a motion by Rachel Kertz and a second by Greg Knell.
Vote:
Yes Linda Jackson.
Yes Rachel Kertz.
Yes Greg Knell.
Yes Ms. Maika Llorens Gulati.
Yes Natu Tuatagaloa.
Minutes:
President Tuatagaloa reviewed the HSD budget was also reviewed on Monday by the Board. He commended Ms. Thomas and the Business Office team for doing a fantastic job with budget development; making the documents easy for the Board and community to read.
Attachments:
1 HSD Narrative and Budget Assumptions
10 HSD Criteria and Standards
11 HSD Pie Charts
12 HSD Fingertip Facts
13 HSD The Annual Budget Process
14 HSD Proposition 98 Crib Sheet
15 HSD The Marin Common Message
2 HSD Budget Adoption Reserves
3 HSD Comparative Spreadhseets
4 HSD Enrollment and ADA Projections
5 HSD School District Certification
6 HSD Worker's Compensation Certification
7 HSD Table of Contents
8 HSD General Fund
9 HSD Multiyear Projections
X. CONFERENCE SESSION
X.1. Report Out Action from Closed Session
Minutes:
President Tuatagaloa reported the Board took action to approve a three (3) year settlement agreement for an Elementary District employee, by the following vote:

Natu Tuatagaloa - NO
Rachel Kertz - YES
Linda M. Jackson - NO
Greg Knell - YES
Maika Llorens Gulati - YES
X.2. Agenda Items for Future Meetings
Minutes:
Trustee Jackson requested a report on LCAP items - Goal 1 related to A-G, D’s and F's, reclassification, and Electives in K-8.

President Tuatagaloa reminded staff to bring a report on backpack safety, and also requested a report on sustainability for district water conservation, and safe routes at all sites.
X.3. Board Member Reports
Minutes:
Maika Llorens Gulati:
- She reported on a meeting with Comcast where she learned of a new WiFi 'hotspot' installed at the Al Boro Community Center for customers in the area.

Greg Knell:
- Together with trustee Jackson he met with Voces de Marin and First 5 regarding human trafficking issues and safety.
- He was contacted by a county public relations team regarding his selection as Marin County Champion, in recognition of his work on prescription drug abuse issues.

Linda M. Jackson:
- She joined the meeting with Voces de Marin regarding human trafficking and new safety information. An informational session for families will be held in the fall, cohosted by the district.
- She attended the district administration’s end-of-year gathering.
- She attended a 10,000 Degrees presentation about support for undocumented students going to college.
- She attended a Marin Promise Ready for College group meeting regarding transcript review and A-G.

Rachel Kertz:
- She has participated in SIS implementation meetings.
- She co-presented a master facilities plan update to the Dixie School Board.

Natu Tuatagaloa:
- He attended the SRCS Leadership team gathering.
- He provided a master facilities plan update to the Dixie Board with trustee Kertz. He noted that lights on the TLHS field was a big topic of discussion, suggesting community outreach be done around this topic moving forward.
X.4. Superintendent(s) Activity Report
Minutes:
Superintendent Watenpaugh:
- He attended a Northridge HOA meeting to provide a master facilities plan update. Site facilities committees will be developed to include neighborhoods as we move into next stages of implementation of the plan.
- He has been asked to be the co-chair of the Marin Promise Partnership group for this school year. A focus for the year will be on analysis of transcripts by Education Trust West to gauge how successful students are in classes, as well as a project with the National Equity Project, working with teachers and counselors about the impact of the analysis.
XI. READJOURNMENT to Closed Session (if necessary)
XII. NEXT REGULAR MEETING - July 27, 2015
Minutes:
President Tuatagaloa noted the next meeting will be a special meeting held on June 30th for end of year approvals. The next regular meeting will be held on July 27th.
XIII. ADJOURNMENT (and Closed Session Report Out, if necessary): 9:00 P.M. (approximate time)
Minutes:
There being no further business, President Tuatagaloa adjourned the meeting at 6:55 PM, in memory of recently deceased SRHS student Aura Celeste Machado.

The resubmit was successful.