banner

SPECIAL BOARD MEETING
Santa Rosa City Schools
January 29, 2020 5:00PM
5:00 p.m. - Closed Session 5:30 p.m. - Open Session Montgomery High School Performing Arts Center 1250 Hahman Drive, Santa Rosa

A. CALL TO ORDER
Minutes:
The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m.
A.1. Public Comment On Closed Session Agenda
Minutes:
There were no public comments on the closed session agenda.
B. RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION
Minutes:
The Board entered closed session to discuss the items on the closed session agenda.
B.1. Public Employee Performance Evaluation (Title of employee being reviewed: Superintendent, Deputy Superintendent, Assistant Superintendent, Principals, Vice Principals, Assistant Principals, Directors, Coordinators) [Gov. Code § 54957]
C. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION
Minutes:
The meeting reconvened at 5:30 p.m.
C.1. Pledge of Allegiance
Minutes:
President Fong led the Pledge of Allegiance.
C.2. Report of Actions Taken In Closed Session
Minutes:
There were no actions taken in closed session.
C.3. Public Comment On Agenda Items, Only
Minutes:
The following individuals addressed the Board regarding item D.2:
Ruth Cawood, Richard Cawood, Mark Warren, William Huntsinger, Brittney Geddes, John Cortopassi, Art Horner, Jana Adams, Adrian Cruz, Rafael Solano, Ana Lugo, Steve Williams, Jose Martinez, Robin Swinth and Johnathon Muchow.
D. STUDY SESSION
D.1. (Action) Approval for the Board President to Sign an Open Letter to Governor Newsom and Treasurer Ma Regarding Taxpayer Certainty and Disaster Tax Relief Act of 2019 on Behalf of the Santa Rosa City Schools Board
Quick Summary / Abstract:

The elected officials of Sonoma County and other impacted groups are poised to sign an open letter to Governor Newsom and Treasurer Ma to prevail upon the Tax Credit Allocation Committee (TCAC) to write regulations that comply not just with the letter of, but with the spirit of the Taxpayer Certainty and Disaster Tax Relief Act of 2019.  Approval for the Board President to represent the Board of Education in signing this letter is requested.




Actions:
Motion
Approve the Board President to sign an open letter to Governor Newsom and Treasurer Ma regarding Taxpayer Certainty and Disaster Tax Relief Act of 2019 on behalf of the Santa Rosa City Schools Board. Passed with a motion by Ed Sheffield and a second by Omar Medina.
Vote:
Yes Alegria De La Cruz.
Yes Laurie Fong.
Yes Jenni Klose.
Yes Stephanie Manieri.
Yes Jill McCormick.
Yes Omar Medina.
Yes Ed Sheffield.
Attachments:
Open Letter to Governor Newsom and Treasurer Ma
D.2. (Discussion/Action) The Student Outcomes for the Class of 2022 and 2023 and the Implementation of the New Graduation Requirements (Board Policy 6146.1 ) Will Be Presented to the Board for Possible Action.
Speaker:
Dr. Anna-Maria Guzman
Quick Summary / Abstract:

The Student Outcomes for the Class of 2022 and 2023 and the Implementation of the New Graduation Requirements  (Board Policy 6146.1 ) will be presented to the Board for possible action.




Rationale:

Purpose

The Board will be presented with an update and take possible action on the new graduation requirements that took effect in the Fall of 2018.  Data will be shown on how our current 9th and 10th graders are performing in Math, Language Other than English, and other core subject areas. Realities regarding the implementation supports and possible next steps will be presented.

Considerations

History:

In the Spring of 2018, the Board of Education voted to change the graduation requirements by adding a year of Math and Language Other Than English (LOTE). The change was needed to address the disparity of students who are college and career ready in Santa Rosa City Schools were not equal among subgroups. At the time, the data shows the percentage of students who were meeting the a-g requirements were trending down, while the state and county were trending up.

Outcomes: 

A reminder of the “why” for the need of the new graduation requirements

  • Commitment to move away from “business as usual” (industrialized schooling)
  • Analysis of current realities
    • Academic outcome data utilizing semester grades, current and longitudinal
    • The longitudinal data and most recent data of the educational outcomes of our students
    • Disproportionate outcomes for Latinx students. 
    • Hearing the voices of the Ridgway Youth Crew and Comstock students as an opportunity to design with and not for
    • Deepening an understanding of current and ongoing supports
    • Addressing grading calibration

The report will include:

  • History of the Journey to the new Strategic Plan 
  • Demographic Data
  • Supports for the last two years
  • Realities of Implementation 
  • The move to Integrated Math and Professional Development to support

Data Highlights

Historical analysis - pre-policy implementation

Look at longitudinal Math failure rate among 9th graders

Standardized test scores in Math, elementary and secondary districts

Outcomes associated with policy implementation in 2018-19

Changes in a-g Math enrollment

Changes in grades in Math, 2017-18 to 2018-19

Class of 2022 (today’s 10th graders)

Class of 2022, grade distribution, with a focus on Fs, in 3 core subjects

  • Math
  • English
  • Language other than English (LOTE)

Historical analysis + post-policy implementation (Math) 

Data Findings: Math

  • In 2017-18, 21 math courses were offered.

    • 9 were college prep 

      • with 1,209 students (68% of students)

    • 12 were not college prep

      • With 556 students (32% of students)

  • In 2018-19, 12 math courses were offered. 

    • 8 were college prep 

      • with 1,861 students (95% of students)

    • 4 were not college prep 

      • with 96 students (5% of students)

  • We increased the percentage of students in a college prep math course from 68% to 95% during the time period (about a 39% increase).

  • There was also an increase in the percentage of students receiving an A-C in a college prep math course, from 46% to 55% (about a 20 percent increase) in students with college qualifying grades in an a-g approved math class. 

  •  The percent of Fs increased 22% to about 25%. This was about 11 percent increase in Fs.

  • Socioeconomically Disadvantaged (SED) students were about twice as likely to receive Fs than their non-SED peers (~28% vs. 13%).

  • Males were more likely to receive Fs than their female peers (~23% vs. ~17%).

  • Special education students and their non-special education peers had the same proportion of Fs. 

  • American Indian or Alaska Native and Hispanics had the highest proportion of Fs

  • Among the 395 9th graders who failed Math 1P or Math 1P Level 2,  225 or 57% retook the class in their 10th grade year. Below are their grades.
     

    Total

    225

    A

    15

    7%

    B

    31

    14%

    C

    35

    16%

    D

    54

    24%

    F

    90

    40%


    90 out of the 225 Failed the class for the second time:

    • 2 in 3 are at SRHS  and EAHS

    • Nearly 3 in 4 are Hispanic 

    • 7 in 10 are SED

    • 63% male

    • Nearly 1 in 2 (n=44) are re-designated English Language proficient, 25 are English Only, and 20 are English Learners.

    • Nearly all (93%) non-special education students.



    Data Findings: English

    Grade distribution in English class*, by grade level, Class of 2022

  • Class of 2022

    9th grade*

    10th grade*

    Total

    1,994

    2,081

    A

    576

    29%

    572

    28%

    B

    582

    29%

    538

    26%

    C

    382

    19%

    420

    20%

    D

    258

    13%

    256

    14%

    F

    196

    10%

    295

    14%



    Data Findings: LOTE (Language Other Than English)

  • Grade distribution in LOTE class*, by grade level, Class of 2022
     

    9th grade*

    10th grade*

    Total

    1,367

    1,404

    A

    442

    32%

    396

    30%

    B

    391

    29%

    398

    29%

    C

    277

    20%

    313

    21%

    D

    147

    11%

    152

    11%

    F

    110

    8%

    145

    9%




 In Summary

Pre-policy implementation


1 year of policy implementation

1.5 years of policy implementation

~3 in 10 ninth graders failed non a-g Math*


~2 in 10 ninth graders failed a-g Math*


Nearly all (95%) of Class of 2022 as 9th graders are enrolled in a a-g Math class (compared to 68% of Class of 2021)


About a 20% increase in all 9th graders (Class of 2022) with a college-qualifying grade in a-g Math class*

Grade disparities by SED, English Language Proficiency, race/ethnicity, and more persist




Overall (2nd semester) failure: 20-23%

About a 11% increase in all 9th graders (Class of 2022) with a F in any Math class*


Overall (2nd semester)

failure: 25%

Overall (1st semester) failure:


2018 - 14%

2019 - 21%

2020 - 17%

*compared to Class of 2021

 Considerations moving forward:

  • Keep the current graduation requirements as is for the class of 2022.
  • Create a waiver for Math and LOTE
  • Pause for one year, which would take the additional year of Math and LOTE off the current graduation requirements, and the class of 2023 would be the first graduates under the policy.
  • Develop and complete the Certificate Specialists (Stanford/Hui's Liberatory Design) from BP 6146.1

Board Policy

BP 6146.1

Education Code

Ed Code 51228

Previous Board Activity

November 13, 2019


































 
Minutes:
The Board heard a presentation from staff regarding the new graduation requirements (BP 6146.1). After a lengthy discussion, the Board agreed that more information was needed before any action could be taken. This item will come back for further discussion on a future agenda.
Attachments:
1. Presentation
Majority Report
Michael Von der Porten Data Tables
November 13, 2019 Power Point
E. ADJOURNMENT
Minutes:
The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 p.m.
1/29/2020 5:00:00 PM ( Original )
PresentAlegria De La Cruz
PresentLaurie Fong
PresentJenni Klose
PresentStephanie Manieri
PresentJill McCormick
PresentOmar Medina
PresentEd Sheffield

The resubmit was successful.