HUSD Board of Education Meeting Hayward USD September 16, 2015 6:30PM Hayward City Hall, 2nd Floor
777 B Street, Hayward, CA 94541
|
Mr. Taylor opened the meeting at 5:02 p.m. |
|
|
Board Members Mr. John Taylor, President Dr. Annette Walker, Vice-President Ms. Lisa Brunner, Clerk Dr. Luis Reynoso, Member Mr. William McGee, Member
Student Board Representatives Carolyn Eusebio, Mt. Eden High School Asia Thompson, Hayward High School Jonathan Figueroa, Tennyson High School Carolina Olvera, Brenkwitz High School
Administration Stanley Dobbs, Superintendent/CEO |
|
The following individuals were absent: Stan Dobbs, Superintendent/CEO Carolyn Eusebio, Mt. Eden High School Carolina Olvera, Brenkwitz High School |
|
|
- Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release (Government Code Section 54957(b))
- Public Employee Appointment/Employment (Government Code Section 54957(b))
- Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(b))
|
|
|
|
The Board reconvened to open session at 6:31 p.m. |
|
|
Dr. Matt Wayne reported that no actions were taken during closed session. The Board Trustees will return to closed session. |
|
|
Passed with a motion by William McGee and a second by Lisa Brunner. |
Yes Lisa Brunner. Yes William McGee. Yes Luis Reynoso. Absent John Taylor. Yes Annette Walker.
|
|
|
|
Asia Thompson, Hayward High School School Academics - Biomedical program, IP score results Made in Hayward pledge cards Programs & Events - Interact Club, Black Student Union, Biology Club Progress report night - October 6th Sports News
Jonathan Figueroa, Tennyson High School Project lead the way crime scene investigation 2 new vice principals, 3 new counselors & new teachers Freshmen orientation Welcome back rally Spirit Week theme is "Movie Trilogies" Oct 19-23 ASB executive council meetings, T-high TV aired Sports News AVID ice cream social Puente back to school night Sept 17 |
|
|
No Board comments on the agenda tonight Passed with a motion by William McGee and a second by Annette Walker. |
Yes Lisa Brunner. Yes William McGee. Yes Luis Reynoso. Yes John Taylor. Yes Annette Walker.
|
|
The Board Trustees had the following comments: Do not try to correct Board members. We cannot shut anyone out. The Measure L oversight committee meeting is this Thursday at 5:30pm. Please make sure this information is on the web and that Board members hear about it. |
|
|
This part of the meeting provides an opportunity for the public to address the Board of Education on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Comments are welcome; however, the Board is prohibited by law from having a discussion with the speaker(s) during this segment of the meeting. Board members may respond briefly, refer an item to staff, or ask clarifying questions. Those wishing to speak must fill out and submit a “Request to Address the Board” card located on a table near the entrance to the meeting room. This card should be given to the recording secretary, along with any material to be shared with the Board. Your item will be taken under consideration and referred to appropriate staff, if necessary. |
|
Speakers: Zakiya Johnson - Voted for K-8, move forward Rick Canas - Move forward and speed up the process Ashley Hernandez - Students voted for K-8 Gricelda Gallo - Approve architect and update the school Sofia Murillo - K-8 facility with smaller class sizes. Build the school as soon as possible. Itoco Garcia - Approve what needs to be approved and move forward. Rev. Dr. Arlene Nehring - Please move forward. The community supports the hire of architects for K-8. Lani Llamido - Move forward with the process, no more delays. Petelo Finau - Unpleasant site at Cherryland, move forward with the process. Yaritza Amador - Supports K-8, approve and move forward. Ivvet Guzman - Supports K-8, approve and move forward. Cecilia Suarez - Supports K-8, approve and move forward. Khyivan Youngblood - Don't argue and move the school faster. Claudia Youngblood - Supports K-8, move the process forward. Sara Lamnin - Move forward in a collaborative way. Monique Leary - Wants transparency & clarity for Measure L. Justin Sturholm - Facility use for baseball. Maleko Tuivaiti - Porta potties on campus are starting to smell up the hallways. Maya Walker - Concern regarding custodian transfer at Hayward High. Dr. Lanette Jimerson - Advocate for K-8 Mercedes Faraj - The union has not been approached to discuss K-8. Not against it, but will impact our members and credentialing issues need to be considered. Transparency The Board Trustees directed staff to follow up and provide clarity via in the loop on the Facility use for baseball and the bathrooms at Hayward High. |
|
|
Lisa Brunner pulled items I.2., I.3.g, I.3.h, I,4.a-i. William McGee pulled items I.1. and I.3.a-h. Move the balance Passed with a motion by William McGee and a second by Lisa Brunner. |
Yes Lisa Brunner. Yes William McGee. Yes Luis Reynoso. Yes John Taylor. Yes Annette Walker.
|
|
|
|
PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION Recommend approval of these appointments, changes of status, waivers, retirements, leaves of absence and terminations.
|
|
Recommend approval of these appointments, changes of status, waivers, retirements, leaves of absence, and terminations.
|
Table termination #20471 with conditions that were mentioned until next meeting Passed with a motion by William McGee and a second by Lisa Brunner. |
Yes Lisa Brunner. Yes William McGee. Yes Luis Reynoso. Yes John Taylor. Yes Annette Walker.
|
|
The Board Trustees had the following questions/comments: Q: 1. Why do we have so many temporary teachers? 2. Why do we have a waiver? 3. What is the Board policy on temporary teachers? 4. What is our policy on waivers? A: 1. The district maintains the number of temporary positions based on the district wide needs. 2. A waiver is used when the district is unable to employ or assign persons who are not appropriately credentialed for their assignment. 3. We will provide the board policy. 4. I will look into this. Do an audit and make sure teachers are classified correctly to P1 and P2. We had this done in the past. |
Appointments Consent
|
|
|
PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION The purpose of this item is to present the Governing Board the proposed architectural services provider for the design needs of the Measure L Bond Program and allow Staff to begin negotiations to execute the Architectural Services Agreement (the “contract”). HISTORY/BACKGROUND On November 4, 2014 the residents of Hayward voted to pass Measure L, which allows HUSD to protect quality education and student safety by modernizing, renovating, replacing and upgrading facilities and the outdated or deteriorating systems within the Hayward Unified School District. To assist with the implementation process, architectural services are necessary for design needs that meet the District’s goals and ideals, as well as, pass DSA approval. HUSD issued a formal request for qualifications and proposals (RFQP) with the purpose of identifying qualified design service providers. Approval of this item will allow HUSD staff to enter into contract negotiations with the selected service provider. The contract will provide HUSD construction ready documents that will meet local, State and federal guidelines, requirements, approvals, codes and regulations within the allotted construction budget and timeline. In addition, these contracts will include services for construction administration and closeout of the projects to meet all applicable codes and regulations, including the Division of the State Architect (DSA). IMPLEMENTATION It is expected that the Measure L architectural design process will follow the 5-phase process as recognized by the American Institute of Architects: 1. Originate, 2. Focus, 3. Design, 4. Build, and 5. Occupy. The first phase included the brainstorming and creative process, including contemplation of draft renditions of potential projects as provided by the various architects. Phase Two focuses on defining the project, scope, features, purpose and functionality with stakeholders as led by the architects. With the approval of the architect listed, HUSD can begin Phase Two and begin working with the community through town hall meetings and focus on the scope and features of that which we wish to build reasonably within appropriate budgetary allocations. HUSD, through the RFQP process, advertised publicly for these services. In addition, through the “outreach” program, Staff reached out to fifty-five (55) design firms to ensure awareness of the RFQP. In response to the RFQP, HUSD received twenty-six (26) submittals with design service qualifications. The submittals where evaluated based on the criteria outlined in the RFQP and the process identified a “short-list”. Due to an impressive response, the short-list was composed of twelve (12) design firms. Staff conducted interviews with each of the firms on the “short-list”. At the August 12, 2015, regular board meeting, the Board approved: Firm Name | Location | 1. | Verde Design, Inc. | | Santa Clara | 2. | CSDA Design Group | | San Francisco | 3. | Hibser Yamauchi Architects, Inc. | | Oakland | Staff recommends the additional design service provider: Firm Name | Location | 4. | LPA, Inc. | | San Jose | | | | |
|
|
It is recommended that the Governing Board approves contract negotiations between Staff and LPA, Inc. for the necessary Architectural Services with the intent to execute a contract. |
Explore all options Passed with a motion by William McGee and a second by Annette Walker. |
Yes Lisa Brunner. Yes William McGee. Yes Luis Reynoso. Yes John Taylor. Yes Annette Walker.
|
|
The Board Trustees had the following questions/comments: Q: 1. There are no parameters set and no direction given. It was described to design a K-8 and not a K-6. If we approve this do we get any other designs or is it a final decision? Can you clarify this? 2. Will drawings come back to us? 3. Can we do a K-6 with a K-8 option? 4. What is the difference between the last bond and this one? We involved the community and displayed drawings. What changed? 5. What happens if we give you planning steps? 6. How many district hire before they plan? 7. Why just a K-8? 8. When the architects come on board do they do all the footwork with the community? A: 1. These concerns will be addressed during the planning stage. No plans are drawn up during the planning stage. This occurs during site and advisory meetings. We will identify the scope of needs during the planning process. 2. Yes 3. In the planning stage we will have the input. We need the assistance of the design team to bring you options. 4. This occurs during the planning stage. A facilities master plan and conceptual plans were provided. 5. In order to coordinate we need the design time on board to what the community is asking for. Their expertise is to identify and then design based off the need. 6. All of them. 7. We are not promoting a K-8. We identify what the need is in the community. We will take those components, but it and then present it to the board. 8. We are a part of the design team. Each person plays a role.
The issue here is transparency. We asked staff to have community engagement level meetings done to find out what the community wants then give the information to the architects. This should have been done. People spoke on things they didn't know about. 7th & 8th grade sometimes done have electives at a K-8. A lot of this work and communication with the community and stakeholders could have been taken care of. We don't need the architect before we hear from the community. The Board never said K-8 as a primary discussion. Please make sure this is an in the loop for all of these meetings. When looking at Numbers from the demographic study and the CDE website. We need to know projected numbers, class sizes, numbers, open enrollment, size of schools we are looking at. Numbers may be an issue. Parents need to know what questions to ask. They need visual help. I am very clear where we are and we have been informed. We need to make sure what voters voted on for Measure L and be clear to do exactly what was promised. |
|
|
PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION To present consultant contracts to the Board of Education for approval. BACKGROUND | Vendor | Purpose | Div/Program | Amount/Fund | a | CSI: California School Inspections | FIT Inspections | Business Services | $10,850 General | b | School Innovations & Achievement | State Mandate Compliance | Business Services | $30,600 General | c | Curriculum Associates (i-Ready) | iReady software licenses for students and staff. Online diagnostic tools for math and reading. | Student & Family & Educational Services | $104,800 Supplemental Concentration Funds, Title I, YEP | d | Alison Pentland | | Educational Services | $ | e | Eden Area YMCA | To provide step, robotics, cooking and color guard to students who are registered in the YEP program. | Student & Family Services | $149,800 21st CCLC, ASSETS & ASES | f | Gurus Education | To provide speech and debate workshops to students registered in YEP at 3 HUSD High Schools. | Student & Family Services | $16,800 21st Century | g | Playworks | To provide workshops for the YEP staff to help provide an energized afterschool program supplemented by youth and afterschool components. | Student & Family Services | $10,050 ASES and 21st Century CCLC | h | Heinamann | | Educational Services | $ |
|
|
Approve the consultant contracts. |
|
|
PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION To present to the Board of Education, a contract to ratify for FIT Inspection Services in order to maintain compliance with Education Code §§ 17002, 17047 regarding school facilities’ “good repair” and rating. HISTORY/BACKGROUND The Eliezer Williams, et al., vs. State of California, et al. (Williams) case was filed as a class action in 2000 in San Francisco County Superior Court. The plaintiffs include nearly 100 San Francisco County students, who filed suit against the State of California and state education agencies, including the California Department of Education (CDE). The basis of the lawsuit was that the agencies failed to provide public school students with equal access to instructional materials, safe and decent school facilities, and qualified teachers. The case was settled in 2004, resulting in the state allocating $138 million in additional funding for standards-aligned instructional materials for schools in the first and second ranks (known as deciles) determined through the 2003 Academic Performance Index (API) Base. The settlement includes another $50 million for implementation costs and other oversight-related activities for schools in deciles one through three (2003 API Base). These two amounts were included in the state budget signed in July 2004 by Governor Schwarzenegger. The settlement was implemented through legislation adopted in August 2004: Senate Bill (SB) 6, SB 550, Assembly Bill (AB) 1550, AB 2727, and AB 3001. As a result of the Williams case, the CDE instituted changes to the School Accountability Report Card (SARC) template that all schools must update and publish annually. The changes help all schools report the overall condition of their facilities, the number of teacher misassignments and vacant teacher positions, and the availability of textbooks or instructional materials. Alameda County Office of Education has historically and randomly inspected and provided a report to Hayward Unified School District on the sites visited. The District would report the findings on their SARCs. Proactively, the District seeks to inspect all sites, establish preventative maintenance schedules and capital project projections from the findings and in accordance with standards set by statute and industry best practices. The following comparison was solicited: Consultant/Contractor | Contract Term | Contract Amount | CSI: California School Inspections | 3 years | Total: $32,550.00. $10,850 annually | Dixon Smart School House LLC | 1 year | $16,600.00 annually | Eric Hall & Associates | | | IMPLEMENTATION An inspector will conduct one visual inspection of each school facility and take pictures of any applicable deficiency. A draft report will be submitted to the District for review, and a final FIT will be submitted electronically thereafter.
|
|
Ratify the contract for FIT Inspections between Hayward Unified School District and CSI: California School Inspections, LLC.
|
Passed with a motion by Luis Reynoso and a second by Lisa Brunner. |
Yes Lisa Brunner. Yes William McGee. Yes Luis Reynoso. Yes John Taylor. Yes Annette Walker.
|
|
FIT Contract: California School Inspections
|
|
|
PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION
To present to the Board of
Education, a contract to ratify for School Innovations & Achievement (SIA)
in order to ensure and maintain compliance with the Mandate Block Grant
Program.
HISTORY/BACKGROUND
For each fiscal year that a
local educational agency (LEA) elects to receive block grant funding, it must
submit a Mandate Block Grant Application which represents the Letter Requesting
Funding. Funds are allocated using
average daily attendance (ADA) calculated as of the 2014-15 Second Principal
Apportionment. The 2015-16 MBG funding
rates set forth in Item 6100-296-0001 of the 2015 Budget Act are as follows:
LEA
|
2014–15 P-2 ADA
|
Amount per ADA1
|
County Offices of Education
(COE)
|
Grades K–8
|
$28.42
|
COE
|
Grades 9–12
|
$56.00
|
COE
|
Countywide2
|
$1.00
|
School Districts
|
Grades K–8
|
$28.42
|
School Districts
|
Grades 9–12
|
$56.00
|
Charter Schools
|
Grades K–8
|
$14.21
|
Charter Schools
|
Grades 9–12
|
$42.00
|
1 Rate is per unit of average
daily attendance (ADA) calculated as of the 2014–15 Second Principal (P-2)
Apportionment; if necessary, the rates may be proportionately reduced to stay
with total available funding
2 Countywide ADA is defined as the
aggregate number of units of ADA within the county attributable to all school
districts for which the county superintendent of schools has jurisdiction
pursuant to Section 1253 of the California Education Code,
charter schools within the county, and the schools operated by the county
superintendent of schools
Listings of eligible
block and non-block grant programs are attached.
The most recent
compliance contract the District held with Capitol Advisors since September 1,
2013 expired on June 30, 2015. Services
include: identifying and gathering documentation to support client
applications, reviewing client applications, and advising and assisting with
behavioral intervention plans.
Consultant/Contractor
|
Contract Term
|
Contract Amount
|
School
Innovations & Achievement
|
3
years
|
$30,600.00
annually
|
Capital
Advisors “CodeChek”
|
3
years
|
$15,500.00
annually
|
Axiom
|
1
year
|
$9,100.00
annually
|
The most comprehensive scope
was provided by School Innovations & Achievement to include the above
application and filing services, as well as, interactive professional
development, interim and annual reports, monitoring of District’s mandated cost
tracking systems, representation with respect to any State audit of mandate
reimbursement claims, and free access to the online publication Cabinet Report. School Innovations & Achievement is also
a well-established and reputable company that immediately aided the District in
submitting Pertussis Claims for years 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2013-2014 this past
July 2015. Capital Advisors whose
contract expired June 30, 2014, with the District did not include prior year,
late and amended mandate block grant filing, HUSD staff training, cost tracking
assistance, and representation for State Controller Office audits in their
quote. Axiom only offered initial
filings, reimbursement claims for non-block grants, and monitoring Commission
decisions.
Moreover, School Innovations
& Achievement recommended applying for non-block grant mandates projecting
an increase to annual claims revenue between 26% - 89%.
Hayward USD MGB vs. Limited Traditional
Filing
|
2015/2016
Revenue Estimates
|
Block
Grant only
|
Block
Grant w/ SI&A filing claims outside of the block
|
Traditional
Claims, limited mandates and claims outside of block w SI&A
|
Revenue
|
$689,494
|
$689,494
|
$1,127,325
|
Claims
outside the block grant (includes Pertussis)
|
$0
|
$53,500
|
$53,500
|
Subtotal
|
$689,494
|
$742,994
|
$1,180,825
|
New claims
outside the block grant* *if they are approved in 2015/16
|
$0
|
$124,000
|
$124,000
|
Grand
Total
|
$689,494
|
$866,994
|
$1,304,825
|
IMPLEMENTATION
On August 25, 2015, the
2015-16 application due not later than August 31, 2015, was submitted to the
California Department of Education (CDE).
The CDE anticipates that 100 percent of each LEA’s MBG will be paid in
November 2015 to all LEAs that submitted the MBG Application. The amount paid will equal 100 percent of
each LEA’s entitlement. |
|
Ratify the contract for Mandate Block Grant Program Compliance between Hayward Unified School District and School Innovations & Achievement. |
Passed with a motion by Luis Reynoso and a second by Lisa Brunner. |
Yes Lisa Brunner. Yes William McGee. Yes Luis Reynoso. Yes John Taylor. Yes Annette Walker.
|
|
The Board Trustees had the following questions/comments: Q: 1. Do we have compliance workers in the district that monitor grants? 2. How have we done this in the past? 3. Do they monitor grants? A: 1. This vendor helps us stay in compliance with mandates. 2. They have assisted us with monitoring mandates in the past. 3. No they do not.
|
State Mandate Compliance Contract - School Innovations and Achievement
|
|
|
Passed with a motion by Luis Reynoso and a second by Lisa Brunner. |
Yes Lisa Brunner. No William McGee. Yes Luis Reynoso. Yes John Taylor. Yes Annette Walker.
|
|
The Board Trustees had the following questions/comments: Q: 1. What is the need? 2. What do you plan to do with it? 3. Who is implementing this? 4. Where is the buy in for teachers? 5. When can we expect an update on results? 6. How is this funded? 7. Title I is designed for Title I students not just YEP. 8. How many YEP students qualify for Title I funding in YEP? 9. These students will use chrome books? A: 1. This is a computer adaptive assessment that allows us to target needs based on responses. 2. It will provide suggestions on lessons. 3. YEP - 4 schools. Staff will allow student access to do intervention to work on skills. 4. We are piloting at 4 schools and YEP as well. The teachers will be provided the information. 5. After second diagnostic, Spring time. 6. 80% Title 1 7. This is going to all students at these schools. An additional component will be offered at YEP. 8. All students qualify for Title I funding at a Title I site. 9. Yes
|
Curriculum Associates
|
|
|
Passed with a motion by Luis Reynoso and a second by Lisa Brunner. |
Yes Lisa Brunner. Yes William McGee. Yes Luis Reynoso. Yes John Taylor. Yes Annette Walker.
|
|
alison
|
|
|
Passed with a motion by Luis Reynoso and a second by Lisa Brunner. |
Yes Lisa Brunner. Yes William McGee. Yes Luis Reynoso. Yes John Taylor. Yes Annette Walker.
|
|
Eden Area YMCA
|
|
|
Passed with a motion by Luis Reynoso and a second by Lisa Brunner. |
Yes Lisa Brunner. Yes William McGee. Yes Luis Reynoso. Yes John Taylor. Yes Annette Walker.
|
|
Gurus Education
|
|
|
Passed with a motion by Luis Reynoso and a second by Lisa Brunner. |
Yes Lisa Brunner. Yes William McGee. Yes Luis Reynoso. Yes John Taylor. Yes Annette Walker.
|
|
The Board Trustees had the following questions/comments: Q: 1. Is grant money being used for this training? A: 1. Yes, that is correct. Provide a list of vendors who provide training for YEP for the last 6 months. |
Playworks
|
|
|
The Board Trustees had the following questions/comments: Q: Why is there is no information provided? A: 1. This was an oversight. This is to add to our original contract to cover additional teachers that need to be trained. |
Heinemann Amendment
|
|
|
PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION To present the following Memorandum of Understandings (MOU) to the Board of Education for approval. BACKGROUND | Vendor | Purpose | Div/Program | Amount/Fund | a | Eden ROP District Contracted Services | The ROP will provide leadership and coordination services and monitor programs to ensure that quality career technical standards are met and in compliance. | Business Services | No Cost | b | Eden ROP Transportation | The District has historically provided and qualified with a Memorandum of Understanding, Transportation Services with Eden Area ROP for students participating in the program from San Leandro, San Lorenzo, and Hayward Unified School Districts. | Business Services | No Cost | c | CSU – East Bay | CSUEB will provide University students to serve as interns in general education and special education | Educational Services | $10,000 – General Fund | d | ACOE IMSS | Integrated Middle School Science (IMSS) works with HUSD to implement, and study a comprehensive science professional development model designed to transform science teaching and learning in underperforming middle schools and build capacity to sustain the efforts beyond the period of the grant. The Alameda County Office of Education is identified as a core partner and subawardee of the grant to assist in its implementation. | Educational Services | No Cost | e | ACOE NGSS | Science Partnership for Instructional Innovators (SPFII) is a professional development partnership aimed at transforming science teaching and learning in predominately low-income schools serving underrepresented minority students and English language learners. The partnership targets teachers in the upper elementary and middle school grade bands for intensive and ongoing professional development while focusing on building organizational capacity within and amongst partners. | Educational Services | No Cost | f | California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) | To provide a comprehensive environmental education program designed for middle school youth in the after school program using scientific tools and technology. | Student & Family Services | $0 | g | Project Eden | Project Eden/Horizon Services, Inc. is a community based agency providing Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug (ATOD) services within our community and at several Hayward Unified Schools. | Student & Family Services | $0 | h | Tiburcio Vazquez Health Center | To provide health school-based health center services at Tennyson and Hayward High Schools. | Student & Family Services | $4,000 Oral Policy Grants | i | AVID Amendment | Additional AVID training needed | Educational Services | $61,098 – previously Board approved for $52,698 |
|
|
Approve the above Memorandum of Understandings (MOU). |
The Community needs to be aware that these programs are being offered at HUSD. Approve the Memorandum of Understandings Passed with a motion by Lisa Brunner and a second by Annette Walker. |
Yes Lisa Brunner. Yes William McGee. Yes Luis Reynoso. Yes John Taylor. Yes Annette Walker.
|
|
|
|
PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION Consideration of a Memorandum of Understanding between Hayward Unified School District and Eden Area Regional Occupational Program (ROP) for Career/Occupational Training Programs for 2015-16, historically known as the District Contracted Program. HISTORY/BACKGROUND Each year, the District offers ROP programs at the high schools, and enters into an agreement with the Eden ROP that specifies the courses that have been approved and outlines the responsibilities of both the District and the ROP related to the District Contracted Program. The ROP provides funding to assist with the costs of the District Contracted Program, but such funding is not intended to cover the District’s full cost of the program. IMPLEMENTATION The ROP will provide leadership and coordination services and monitor programs to ensure that quality career technical standards are met and in compliance. The ROP anticipates 25 sections and a cap of 193 ADA. Revenue to be generated by the District is calculated at 75% of $2,933.33 per ADA plus $21,000.00 for career technician salaries to total $445,600.00. |
|
Approve the Memorandum of Understanding with Eden Area Regional Occupational Program (ROP) for Career/Occupational
Training Programs for 2015-16. |
Eden ROP - District Contracted Program
|
|
|
PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION To present to the Governing Board, for review and approval, the final agreement between Hayward Unified School District (HUSD) and Eden Area Regional Occupational Program (EAROP) for transportation services for the 2015-16 school year. HISTORY/BACKGROUND The District has historically provided and qualified with a Memorandum of Understanding, Transportation Services with Eden Area ROP for students participating in the program from San Leandro, San Lorenzo, and Hayward Unified School Districts. IMPLEMENTATION The MOU defines the estimated annual mileage of 43,000 with service area estimates outlined on the MOU, by school district. EAROP will pay HUSD $322,515.00. Excess mileage above 43,000 will be invoiced at $7.50/mile. |
|
It is recommended that the Governing Board approve the Transportation Service
Agreement between HUSD and EAROP for the 2015-16 school year.
|
Eden ROP - 2015-16 Transportation
|
|
|
PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION To provide a comprehensive environmental education program designed for middle school youth in the after school program. Using scientific tools and technology, YEP middle school students in the Science Action Club (SAC) will carry out hands-on nature investigations, contribute to authentic research projects, and help scientists around the globe answer pressing questions about our planet. HISTORY/BACKGROUND California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) will be working with YEP, to provide students with the opportunity to participate in the science action club’s and professional development for staff. The Science Action Club Project is fully funded by Cal Academy of Science and the California School-Age Consortium. No cost to the YEP Program or general fund. IMPLEMENTATION CalSAC will provide 24 hands-on environmental science activities to approximately 18-24 YEP students at Bret Harte, Cesar Chavez, Martin L. King Jr., Ochoa and Winton Middle School. The Science Action Club will operate 2 days a week at all 5 comprehensive middle schools. The program is led by a YEP Program Leader who will trained with the curriculum by a certified CalSAC trainer. The club is to provide a unique opportunity for underserved middle school students to participate in a fun, educational science and environmental-oriented after school program that will spark their continued interest in STEM. |
|
Approve the Memorandum of Understanding
|
CalSAC MOU
|
|
|
PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION The purpose the presentation is to present to the Board of Education the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Hayward Unified School District and Project Eden/Horizon Services, Inc. HISTORY/BACKGROUND Project Eden/Horizon Services, Inc. is a community based agency providing Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug (ATOD) services within our community and at several Hayward Unified Schools. This agency has worked individually with sites and created opportunities for our secondary students to participate in education and prevention activities and to receive support around issues of tobacco, alcohol and other drug use. In addition, Project Eden/Horizons Services, Inc. provides parent education workshops. This MOU is being brought forth to formalize our ongoing collaboration as well as to outline mutual commitments for the 2015-2016 school year. IMPLEMENTATION: The implementation of this MOU will formalize the service delivery model at 6 secondary school sites, Bret Harte and Winton Middle Schools and Hayward, Tennyson, Mt Eden and Brenkwitz High Schools. |
|
Approve Memorandum of Understanding as recommended. |
Project Eden MOU
|
|
|
PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION The purpose the presentation is to present to the Board of Education the memorandum of understanding between Hayward Unified School District, Tiburcio Vasquez Health Center, Inc. and the Alameda County Health Care Services Agency. HISTORY/BACKGROUND Tiburcio Vasquez Health Center, Inc. has been collaborating with Hayward Unified School District and the Alameda County Health Services to provide school-based health center services at Tennyson High School and Hayward High School. These services include health education, mental health care services, screening and referral services, treatment services, after school services and parent education. These services have been a support to Tennyson High School and Hayward High School as they provide the much needed resources for students to overcome their barriers to learning. IMPLEMENTION This MOU is an ongoing MOU to support the operations of the Health Center and all of its services. |
|
Approve Memorandum of Understanding as recommended.
|
TVHC MOU
|
|
|
BACKGROUND: The IEP teams have determined these students require the services of a Non-Public School, based on their exceptional needs. S U M M A R Y Non-Public School Purpose HUSD Cost Devereux Florida Tuition and related services $ 180,083.96 Pine Hill School Tuition and related services $ 53,622.00 Provo Canyon School Tuition and related services $ 125,840.00 Spectrum Center Tuition and related services $2,258,259.80 |
|
Approve placements of students in Non-Public Schools |
|
|
PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION The current site provided by HUSD is in-sufficient to house all of its enrollees. Additionally, the closing of FAME Charter in Fremont has brought more students to Key Academy. HISTORY/BACKGROUND Key Academy was granted approval of their Petition in 2013. The school is located at the Markham campus, which shares the site with Faith Ringgold Elementary school. For the 2014-15 school year Key Academy leased the Markham campus. For the 2015-16 school year, Key Academy submitted a Prop 39 request to use District facilities. However, the District does not have sufficient space to at Markham to serve all of the Key Academy students. IMPLEMENTATION Key Academy Key Academy Charter School is asking to be able to add an additional facility in the Eden Area (but outside of the City of Hayward) to serve all of its students. Key Academy has secured a 2nd site at the Epiphany Lutheran Church (16244/48 Carolyn St, San Leandro for the 2015-16 school year. Key Academy would continue to occupy the Markham site per our Proposition 39 Agreement. A more detailed explanation of the request is attached. The Education Code allows for this additional site. Since this is not considered a material change to the charter, it does not require that Key Academy resubmit a petition for Board approval. As HUSD does not have an additional facility to provide Key Academy, District administration has approved the use of the space. The District is bringing this proposal forward for ratification so that the public is aware that Key Academy is operating a space outside of the District boundaries. |
|
Ratify the use of a second site outside of District boundaries for Key Academy. |
Key Academy Facility Use Ratification
|
|
|
PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION To present study trips for Board consideration. HISTORY/BACKGROUND a) Eldridge– October 22-23, 2015: Fifty 5-6th grade students will participate in a history study trip on the U.S.S. Hornet in Alameda, California. Students will travel by private vehicles and be housed in bunk beds on the ship. There will be 5 male chaperones and 9 female chaperones. Ray Lepinsky, teacher, is in charge of this trip. IMPLEMENTATION The cost for students is $70. Fundraisers and donations will finance this trip. No student will be denied participation due to lack of funds. The event will take place Thursday, October 22 through Friday, October 23. b) Hayward High– February 24-27, 2016: One hundred 10-11th grade students will participate in a college tour in Northern California. Students will travel by charter bus and be housed in a hotel. There will be 5 male chaperones and 5 female chaperones. Lupe Santoya, counselor, is in charge of this trip. IMPLEMENTATION The cost for students is $200. Puente and AVID funds and fundraisers will finance this trip. No student will be denied participation due to lack of funds. The event will take place Wednesday, February 24 through Saturday, February 27. |
|
Approve above mentioned study trips. |
|
|
PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION To provide information and an update on Williams Complaints. HISTORY/BACKGROUND Williams Legislation requires quarterly reports to the H.U.S.D. Board of Trustees. This Legislation calls for public schools statewide to provide equal access to qualified teachers, instructional materials, and campus facilities that are safe and in good condition. The eligibility list is required to be updated every 3 years. The following sites are Williams’ schools based on their 2009 base API. Bowman | Longwood | Cesar Chavez | Cherryland | Lorin Eden | Winton | East Avenue | Palma Ceia | | Eden Gardens | Park | | Eldridge | Ruus | Hayward | Fariview | Schafer Park | Mt. Eden | Glassbrook | Strobridge | Tennyson | Harder | Tyrrell | |
No William’s complaints were received for this Quarterly Report |
|
This is an information item only |
|
|
PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION The Governing Board is being presented with the following Resolutions: Resolution 1516-07, Gann Amendment Limitation Resolution 1516-08, Adult Ed AB86 & AB104 Compliance Resolution 1516-09, Suicide Prevention Awareness Month
|
|
It is recommended that the Governing Board adopt the Board Resolutions. |
|
|
PURPOSE OF
PRESENTATION To present to the Governing Board an annual update and
required resolution regarding the Gann Limit calculation. This annual update is
provided in conjunction with the Unaudited Actuals Financial Reporting and year
end close process. HISTORY/BACKGROUND In 1978, California voters passed Proposition 13, which
limited how much public agencies can collect in taxes. In 1979, the voters
passed Proposition 4, commonly called the Gann Limit which determines the amount
public agencies can spend from the proceeds of state and local taxes. In September of each year, Education Code 42132 requires
school districts to adopt a resolution identifying the actual appropriations
limit for the prior year and the estimated limit for the forthcoming year. This
resolution shall include the report used to calculate the limit and identify if
an increase to the limit is required. IMPLEMENTATION
The Gann Limit calculation is a supplemental report included
in the Unaudited Actuals Financial Report (Form GANN). The District is not
reporting an increase in its Gann Limit appropriation as reflected in Section
D, line 10 of the Form GANN report. Pending
adoption of the resolution, this report will be submitted to the Alameda County
of Office of Education as a component of the District’s 2014-15 Unaudited
Actuals Report. |
|
It is recommended that the Governing Board adopt Resolution 1516-07 declaring that appropriations in the budget for the 2014-15 and 2015-16 fiscal
years do not exceed the limitations imposed by Proposition 4, Gann Amendment Limitation. |
2015-16 GANN Limit Calculation Resolution 1516-07 GANN Amendment Limitation
|
|
|
PURPOSE OF RESOLUTION HUSD needs to assign designee to ensure compliance with new law (Adult School funding) HISTORY/BACKGROUND According to Adult School reorganization, authorized via AB86 and AB104 (and the regulations that govern), the Hayward Unified School District designates, Dr. Guy ‘Zak’ Zakrevsky as our authorized representative to ensure compliance. Dr. Zakrevsky has been our District’s Director of the Adult School for the past 2 years, and has been involved with the reorganization of Adult Schools (authorized under AB86 & AB104). Adult Schools are organized (for funding and programs) within consortiums – created in conjunction with Community College Districts. The Adult Schools still operate under the jurisdiction of local school districts, but funding is aligned to the consortiums (and distributed through the Chancellor’s Office of the Community College System). A letter from the MACC (Mid-Alameda County Consortium) is included (outlining the regulations). IMPLEMENTATION Dr. Zakrevsky has been involved with the process for the past 2 years. This is a compliance requirement.
|
|
Adopt Resolution # 1516-08 |
Adult Ed Resolution Board Designation Memo Designation Letter
|
|
|
PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION The minutes of the following Board of Education Meeting is being presented for adoption. IMPLEMENTATION After adoption by the Board of Education, these minutes become the official record of actions taken by the Board of Education and are kept indefinitely. |
|
Adopt the minutes from the Board of Education Meeting. |
|
|
7:15 PM |
PURPOSE
OF PRESENTATION The purpose of this presentation is to give an
update on the Bond programs (both Measure I and Measure L). The second
purpose is to present the updated Demographic Study, specifically as it relates
to the community and Governing Board’s interest in potentially migrating to
different grade span configurations (K-6, 6-8, K-8, K-5, etc.). HISTORY/BACKGROUND Staff presented findings from the Demographic Study on January 30,
2013. Also at the request of the Governing Board, on May 18, 2013,
information and different scenarios focusing on the Board’s interest to
potentially reconstitute HUSD elementary and middle school grade spans were
presented. On October 9, 2013, the Board discussed an update on the
demographic and boundary study process and was interested in the
discussion/project being revitalized in preparation for potential community
meetings. A demographics study is a planning tool used in conjunction
with other information in a District’s decision-making process for future
staffing and future facility needs analysis. IMPLEMENTATION: Victor Lopez, Vanir
Construction Management, Inc. will provide an update and projected timelines
for Measure I and Measure L bond projects.
David Kaitz, Davis Demographics & Planning, Inc. will
provide an updated Demographics Study. |
|
It is recommended that the Governing Board receive for information the bond update
and the updated Demographic Study.
|
The Board Trustees had the following questions/comments: Q: 1. Are you the same company who did this for us in 2010? 2. Enrollment went up and countered what you said. Our base is different by 2,000. We are working with different numbers. 3. Is this for facility planning? 4. This report shows declining students. There should be actual attendance by areas. 5. Is this report updated? 6. What will next steps be? When will we get a new update? 7. Do you speak to the community? A: 1. Yes 2. These are by residents, then by who actually attended. 3. The purpose is to show what is going on geographically. It is hard to predict enrollment. 4. On page 22 of the report you will see those numbers on the map. 5. This is based on last fall data. New data is received in October. 6. Draft-November or December, discuss with staff, sneak preview - January, then the final draft early February. 7. If the district requests it. I feel like we are behind in demographics. We should have community meetings. Do we look at changing boundaries to reduce combo classes? What are the capacities of elementary schools? I don't have this information in this report. We need to focus on boundaries to reduce re-directs. When we start this process we need to look at boundaries and demographics. |
2015 Demographic Report and Bond Update Presentations 2015-2021 Demographic Report on Student Population Projections
|
|
|
PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION To present the following Board Bylaws & Policies to the Board of Education: 1 | BP 0420.1 | School-Based Program Coordination | 17 | BP 4243 | Negotiations/Consultation | 2 | BP 0420 | School Plans/Site Councils | 18 | BP 5111 | Admission | 3 | BP 0440 | District Technology Plan | 19 | BP 5113.1 | Chronic Absence And Truancy | 4 | BP 0460 | Local Control And Accountability Plan | 20 | BP 5125 | Student Records | 5 | BP 0520.4 | Quality Education Investment Schools | 21 | BP 5126 | Awards For Achievement | 6 | BP 1240 | Volunteer Assistance | 22 | BP 5131.2 | Bullying | 7 | BP 1312.3 | Uniform Complaint Procedures | 23 | BP 5141.4 | Child Abuse Prevention And Reporting | 8 | BP 1340 | Access To District Records | 24 | BP 5144.1 | Suspension And Expulsion/Due Process | 9 | BP 3100 | Budget | 25 | BP 5148 | Child Care And Development | 10 | BP 3312 | Contracts | 26 | BP 5148.2 | Before/After School Programs | 11 | BP 4040 | Employee Use of Technology | 27 | BP 5148.3 | Preschool/Early Childhood Education | 12 | BP 4118 | Suspension/Disciplinary Action | 28 | BP 6158 | Independent Study | 13 | BP 4121 | Temporary/Substitute Personnel | 29 | BP 6163.4 | Student Use Of Technology | 14 | BP 4131 | Staff Development | 30 | BP 6170.1 | Transitional Kindergarten | 15 | BP 4143 | Negotiations/Consultation | 31 | BP 6174 | Education For English Language Learners | 16 | BP 4231 | Staff Development | 32 | BB 9124 | Education For English Language Learners |
HISTORY/BACKGROUND California School Board Association (CSBA) submits recommended updates and revisions to current Board Bylaws and Board Policies to meet state and federal laws and regulations. |
|
Approve revisions of the Board Policies & Bylaws presented to the Board of Education. |
Approve all except for Board Bylaw 9124. Table this item for clarification and language. Passed with a motion by Lisa Brunner and a second by Annette Walker. |
Yes Lisa Brunner. Yes William McGee. Yes Luis Reynoso. Yes John Taylor. Yes Annette Walker.
|
|
The Board Trustees had the following questions/comments: Q: 1. What if I have a question on a conflict of interest. Such as I have questions on a job outside that may be a conflict on me being a Board member? 2. If I go to the Board President I should be granted access. 3. What can we add to give access to legal? We gave the Superintendent plenty of suggestions to word this. 4. What verbiage can we put in place to give us access? We spend way more money at conference and should continue to be safe, confident being board members. A: 1. This is a personal issue, not a board issue. 2. As worded or 3 people need to say yes (majority of the board). 3. Controls are put in place to protect the Board. I represent the Board and as your lawyer I provided a legal opinion to the Superintendent that went out to the Board Trustees. 4. The existing concept is the "gate keeper" approach. You could add by the Board President or majority of the board. CSBA does not run anything. The Superintendent is not an elected official. We paid legal to answer our question and she did. A legal opinion was sent to us. We are not paying you to write our policy, that is our job. We need to adhere to laws. Issues came up when a Trustee asked and was denied. Then told they can only do it via writing. We violated someone's first amendment rights. |
Board Policies & Board Bylaws
|
|
|
PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION Provide an update on HUSD summer academies and programs offered in 2015. HISTORY/BACKGROUND Hayward Unified School District’s summer programs and academies provided a variety of learning opportunities for students. This summer HUSD was able to provide a coordinated, comprehensive, student-focused experience.. Summer School Programs Update In the attached presentation, we provide information on the following: |
|
This update is for informational purposes only. |
Tabled Passed with a motion by Luis Reynoso and a second by Lisa Brunner. |
Yes Lisa Brunner. Yes William McGee. Yes Luis Reynoso. Yes John Taylor. Yes Annette Walker.
|
|
summer school
|
|
|
BACKGROUND During the 2014-15 the State of California implemented the first California Assessment of Student Progress and Performance (CAASPP). This is the new assessment based on the Common Core standards. On September 9, 2015 the CDE released the results of the CAASPP. These results establish the baseline for student performance in meeting Common Core standards. PRESENTATION The purpose of this presentation is to discuss the following … Provide an overview of the CAASPP assessment and how it works Explain the new reporting system Share an initial analysis of CAASPP results As the CAASPP results were just publicly released, a more detailed analysis will follow.
|
|
This is for informational purposes only. |
Tabled Passed with a motion by Lisa Brunner and a second by William McGee. |
Yes Lisa Brunner. Yes William McGee. Yes Luis Reynoso. Yes John Taylor. Yes Annette Walker.
|
|
caaspp
|
|
|
PURPOSE OF
PRESENTATION
The Unaudited Actuals report has been prepared in
accordance with Education Code Section 41010 and is being presented for review
and acceptance. HISTORY/BACKGROUND
The District is required to
close it books for the fiscal year and submit its financial statements to the
Alameda County Office of Education (ACOE) in September. After review, the ACOE will forward the report
to the California Department of Education (CDE).
The report is prepared using
the CDE’s required Standardized Account Code Structure (SACS) financial
statement reporting format. The
Unaudited Actuals reports the District’s actual financial activity for the 2014-15
fiscal year, and the District’s beginning fund and cash balances for the 2015-16
year.
IMPLEMENTATION
The Unaudited Actuals Report will be submitted to the ACOE
by September 17, 2015 for the required review and submission to the CDE by
October 15, 2015. The report will be audited by the District’s independent
auditor in September 2015, and the final Audited Financial Report will be
presented to the Governing Board in January 2016. |
|
It is recommended that the Governing Board review and accept the 2014-15 Unaudited Actuals financial report as presented.
|
Passed with a motion by Luis Reynoso and a second by Lisa Brunner. |
Yes Lisa Brunner. Yes William McGee. Yes Luis Reynoso. Yes John Taylor. Yes Annette Walker.
|
|
The Board Trustees had the following questions/comments: Q: 1. Clarify ending balance on page 9. Are we negative? 2. What would it look like if we added another $500,000 to Adult Ed? Please provide and in the loop. 3. Add line to separate Admin expenses and teachers. Coordinate with years going back. Can you provide a trend on administrators cost? 4. Food Services why are they in the red? 5. Is the engagement letter for auditors approved by the Board? A: 1. No 2. I will provide this information in an in the loop memo. 3. I will provide this information in an in the loop memo. 4. They are positive and are not in the red. 5. No Why can't we do that here? We need control back. auditors need to report to us. I want the Board to get control back. |
FY 2014-15 Unaudited Actuals Financial Report
|
|
|
PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION
The Board of Education
appreciates, and would like to acknowledge, the generosity of parents and the
community. HISTORY/BACKGROUND
Many parents and community
members donate items to benefit the students of Hayward Unified School
District. Individual schools will forward the donation information to the Board
of Education so that a formal acknowledgement may be made at the meetings and a
letter of appreciation can be composed. IMPLEMENTATION
Accept donations as follows:
DONOR
|
ITEM
|
VALUE
|
SITE
|
Alumni
Anonymous Donation
|
Cash
|
$10,000
|
Hayward
High School Football
|
|
|
Accept this generous donation. A letter of thanks will be sent to the donor by members of the Board of Education.
|
Passed with a motion by William McGee and a second by Annette Walker. |
Yes Lisa Brunner. Yes William McGee. Yes Luis Reynoso. Yes John Taylor. Yes Annette Walker.
|
|
|
|
Regular Meetings are held at Hayward City Hall, 2nd Floor Council Chambers 777 B Street, Hayward, CA 5:00 p.m. (CLOSED SESSION) 6:30 p.m. (OPEN SESSION)
Upcoming Meetings: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 Wednesday, October 14, 2015 |
|
|
|
The Board Trustees adjourned to Closed Session at 10:56 p.m. The Board Trustees reconvened to Open Session at 11:26 p.m. No actions were taken during Closed Session.
The meeting adjourned at 11:27 p.m. Prepared by Rosemary Rivas for Stanley Dobbs, Superintendent/CEO and Secretary to the Board of Education |
|
Present | Lisa Brunner |
Present | William McGee |
Present | Luis Reynoso |
Present | John Taylor |
Present | Annette Walker |
|
|