banner

HUSD Board of Education Meeting
Hayward USD
September 16, 2015 6:30PM
Hayward City Hall, 2nd Floor 777 B Street, Hayward, CA 94541

A. CALL TO ORDER (Procedural Item)
Minutes:
Mr. Taylor opened the meeting at 5:02 p.m.
A.1. Board Roll Call (Procedural Item)
Rationale:
Board Members          
Mr. John Taylor, President                
Dr. Annette Walker, Vice-President        
Ms. Lisa Brunner, Clerk   
Dr. Luis Reynoso, Member 
Mr. William McGee, Member 

Student Board Representatives 
Carolyn Eusebio, Mt. Eden High School 
Asia Thompson, Hayward High School 
Jonathan Figueroa, Tennyson High School 
Carolina Olvera, Brenkwitz High School 

Administration 
Stanley Dobbs, Superintendent/CEO
 
Minutes:
The following individuals were absent:
Stan Dobbs, Superintendent/CEO
Carolyn Eusebio, Mt. Eden High School
Carolina Olvera, Brenkwitz High School
B. ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION (Procedural Item)
B.1. Closed Session (Procedural Item)
Rationale:
  • Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release (Government Code Section 54957(b))
  • Public Employee Appointment/Employment (Government Code Section 54957(b))              
  • Conference with Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation (Government Code Section 54956.9(b))
    • Number of Cases: 2


 
C. RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION (Procedural Item)
Minutes:
The Board reconvened to open session at 6:31 p.m.
C.1. Pledge of Allegiance (Procedural Item)
C.2. Made in Hayward Pledge (Procedural Item)
C.3. Announcement of Interpretation Services (Procedural Item)
C.4. Collect "Request to Address The Board of Education" Cards (Procedural Item)
C.5. Report Actions Taken by the Board of Education in Closed Session (Procedural Item)
Minutes:
Dr. Matt Wayne reported that no actions were taken during closed session.
The Board Trustees will return to closed session.
C.6. Approve Agenda (Action Item)
Actions:
Motion
Passed with a motion by William McGee and a second by Lisa Brunner.
Vote:
Yes Lisa Brunner.
Yes William McGee.
Yes Luis Reynoso.
Absent John Taylor.
Yes Annette Walker.
D. SPECIAL FEATURE/STUDENT RECOGNITION (Procedural Item)
D.1. Chinese Yantai Hayward Partnership (Procedural Item)
E. COMMENTS BY THE STUDENT BOARD MEMBERS (Procedural Item)
Minutes:
Asia Thompson, Hayward High School
School Academics - Biomedical program, IP score results
Made in Hayward pledge cards
Programs & Events - Interact Club, Black Student Union, Biology Club
Progress report night - October 6th
Sports News

Jonathan Figueroa, Tennyson High School
Project lead the way crime scene investigation
2 new vice principals, 3 new counselors & new teachers
Freshmen orientation
Welcome back rally
Spirit Week theme is "Movie Trilogies" Oct 19-23
ASB executive council meetings, T-high TV aired
Sports News
AVID ice cream social
Puente back to school night Sept 17
F. COMMENTS BY THE BOARD MEMBERS (Procedural Item)
Actions:
Motion
No Board comments on the agenda tonight Passed with a motion by William McGee and a second by Annette Walker.
Vote:
Yes Lisa Brunner.
Yes William McGee.
Yes Luis Reynoso.
Yes John Taylor.
Yes Annette Walker.
Minutes:
The Board Trustees had the following comments:
Do not try to correct Board members.
We cannot shut anyone out.
The Measure L oversight committee meeting is this Thursday at 5:30pm. Please make sure this information is on the web and that Board members hear about it.
G. PUBLIC COMMENTS (Procedural Item)
Rationale:

This part of the meeting provides an opportunity for the public to address the Board of Education on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Comments are welcome; however, the Board is prohibited by law from having a discussion with the speaker(s) during this segment of the meeting. Board members may respond briefly, refer an item to staff, or ask clarifying questions. Those wishing to speak must fill out and submit a “Request to Address the Board” card located on a table near the entrance to the meeting room. This card should be given to the recording secretary, along with any material to be shared with the Board. Your item will be taken under consideration and referred to appropriate staff, if necessary. 

 
Minutes:
Speakers:
Zakiya Johnson - Voted for K-8, move forward
Rick Canas - Move forward and speed up the process
Ashley Hernandez - Students voted for K-8
Gricelda Gallo - Approve architect and update the school
Sofia Murillo - K-8 facility with smaller class sizes. Build the school as soon as possible.
Itoco Garcia - Approve what needs to be approved and move forward.
Rev. Dr. Arlene Nehring - Please move forward. The community supports the hire of architects for K-8.
Lani Llamido - Move forward with the process, no more delays.
Petelo Finau - Unpleasant site at Cherryland, move forward with the process.
Yaritza Amador - Supports K-8, approve and move forward.
Ivvet Guzman - Supports K-8, approve and move forward.
Cecilia Suarez - Supports K-8, approve and move forward.
Khyivan Youngblood - Don't argue and move the school faster.
Claudia Youngblood - Supports K-8, move the process forward.
Sara Lamnin - Move forward in a collaborative way.
Monique Leary - Wants transparency & clarity for Measure L.
Justin Sturholm - Facility use for baseball.
Maleko Tuivaiti - Porta potties on campus are starting to smell up the hallways.
Maya Walker - Concern regarding custodian transfer at Hayward High.
Dr. Lanette Jimerson - Advocate for K-8
Mercedes Faraj - The union has not been approached to discuss K-8. Not against it, but will impact our members and credentialing issues need to be considered. Transparency
The Board Trustees directed staff to follow up and provide clarity via in the loop on the Facility use for baseball and the bathrooms at Hayward High.
H. COMMENTS BY THE SUPERINTENDENT (Procedural Item)
I. CONSENT AGENDA (Consent Agenda)
Actions:
Motion
Lisa Brunner pulled items I.2., I.3.g, I.3.h, I,4.a-i. William McGee pulled items I.1. and I.3.a-h. Move the balance Passed with a motion by William McGee and a second by Lisa Brunner.
Vote:
Yes Lisa Brunner.
Yes William McGee.
Yes Luis Reynoso.
Yes John Taylor.
Yes Annette Walker.
I.1. Appointments, Status Changes, Waivers, Retirements, Leaves of Absence (LOA) & Terminations (Human Resources) (Consent Item)
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION

Recommend approval of these appointments, changes of status, waivers, retirements, leaves of absence and terminations.


 
Recommended Motion:

Recommend approval of these appointments, changes of status, waivers, retirements, leaves of absence, and terminations.


Actions:
Motion
Table termination #20471 with conditions that were mentioned until next meeting Passed with a motion by William McGee and a second by Lisa Brunner.
Vote:
Yes Lisa Brunner.
Yes William McGee.
Yes Luis Reynoso.
Yes John Taylor.
Yes Annette Walker.
Minutes:
The Board Trustees had the following questions/comments:
Q:
1. Why do we have so many temporary teachers?
2. Why do we have a waiver?
3. What is the Board policy on temporary teachers?
4. What is our policy on waivers?
A:
1. The district maintains the number of temporary positions based on the district wide needs.
2. A waiver is used when the district is unable to employ or assign persons who are not appropriately credentialed for their assignment.
3. We will provide the board policy.
4. I will look into this.
Do an audit and make sure teachers are classified correctly to P1 and P2. We had this done in the past.
Attachments:
Appointments Consent
I.2. Measure L - Architect Services (Business Services) (Consent Item)
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION         

The purpose of this item is to present the Governing Board the proposed architectural services provider for the design needs of the Measure L Bond Program and allow Staff to begin negotiations to execute the Architectural Services Agreement (the “contract”).

HISTORY/BACKGROUND

On November 4, 2014 the residents of Hayward voted to pass Measure L, which allows HUSD to protect quality education and student safety by modernizing, renovating, replacing and upgrading facilities and the outdated or deteriorating systems within the Hayward Unified School District.

To assist with the implementation process, architectural services are necessary for design needs that meet the District’s goals and ideals, as well as, pass DSA approval.  HUSD issued a formal request for qualifications and proposals (RFQP) with the purpose of identifying qualified design service providers.

Approval of this item will allow HUSD staff to enter into contract negotiations with the selected service provider. The contract will provide HUSD construction ready documents that will meet local, State and federal guidelines, requirements, approvals, codes and regulations within the allotted construction budget and timeline. In addition, these contracts will include services for construction administration and closeout of the projects to meet all applicable codes and regulations, including the Division of the State Architect (DSA). 

IMPLEMENTATION

It is expected that the Measure L architectural design process will follow the 5-phase process as recognized by the American Institute of Architects: 1. Originate, 2. Focus, 3. Design, 4. Build, and 5. Occupy.  The first phase included the brainstorming and creative process, including contemplation of draft renditions of potential projects as provided by the various architects.  Phase Two focuses on defining the project, scope, features, purpose and functionality with stakeholders as led by the architects.  With the approval of the architect listed, HUSD can begin Phase Two and begin working with the community through town hall meetings and focus on the scope and features of that which we wish to build reasonably within appropriate budgetary allocations. 

HUSD, through the RFQP process, advertised publicly for these services. In addition, through the “outreach” program, Staff reached out to fifty-five (55) design firms to ensure awareness of the RFQP. In response to the RFQP, HUSD received twenty-six (26) submittals with design service qualifications. The submittals where evaluated based on the criteria outlined in the RFQP and the process identified a “short-list”. Due to an impressive response, the short-list was composed of twelve (12) design firms. Staff conducted interviews with each of the firms on the “short-list”. At the August 12, 2015, regular board meeting, the Board approved:   

Firm Name

Location

1.

Verde Design, Inc.

 

Santa Clara

2.

CSDA Design Group

 

San Francisco

3.

Hibser Yamauchi Architects, Inc.

 

Oakland

 Staff recommends the additional design service provider: 

Firm Name

Location

4.

LPA, Inc.

 

San Jose

 


 
Recommended Motion:

It is recommended that the Governing Board approves contract negotiations between Staff and LPA, Inc. for the necessary Architectural Services with the intent to execute a contract.

Actions:
Motion
Explore all options Passed with a motion by William McGee and a second by Annette Walker.
Vote:
Yes Lisa Brunner.
Yes William McGee.
Yes Luis Reynoso.
Yes John Taylor.
Yes Annette Walker.
Minutes:
The Board Trustees had the following questions/comments:
Q:
1. There are no parameters set and no direction given. It was described to design a K-8 and not a K-6. If we approve this do we get any other designs or is it a final decision? Can you clarify this?
2. Will drawings come back to us?
3. Can we do a K-6 with a K-8 option?
4. What is the difference between the last bond and this one? We involved the community and displayed drawings. What changed?
5. What happens if we give you planning steps?
6. How many district hire before they plan?
7. Why just a K-8?
8. When the architects come on board do they do all the footwork with the community?
A:
1. These concerns will be addressed during the planning stage. No plans are drawn up during the planning stage. This occurs during site and advisory meetings. We will identify the scope of needs during the planning process.
2. Yes
3. In the planning stage we will have the input. We need the assistance of the design team to bring you options.
4. This occurs during the planning stage. A facilities master plan and conceptual plans were provided.
5. In order to coordinate we need the design time on board to what the community is asking for. Their expertise is to identify and then design based off the need.
6. All of them.
7. We are not promoting a K-8. We identify what the need is in the community. We will take those components, but it and then present it to the board.
8. We are a part of the design team. Each person plays a role.

The issue here is transparency.
We asked staff to have community engagement level meetings done to find out what the community wants then give the information to the architects. This should have been done.
People spoke on things they didn't know about.
7th & 8th grade sometimes done have electives at a K-8.
A lot of this work and communication with the community and stakeholders could have been taken care of.
We don't need the architect before we hear from the community. The Board never said K-8 as a primary discussion.
Please make sure this is an in the loop for all of these meetings.
When looking at Numbers from the demographic study and the CDE website. We need to know projected numbers, class sizes, numbers, open enrollment, size of schools we are looking at. Numbers may be an issue.
Parents need to know what questions to ask. They need visual help.
I am very clear where we are and we have been informed. We need to make sure what voters voted on for Measure L and be clear to do exactly what was promised.
I.3. Approve Consultant Contracts (Consent Item)
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION

To present consultant contracts to the Board of Education for approval. 

 

BACKGROUND

 

Vendor

Purpose

Div/Program

Amount/Fund

a

CSI: California School Inspections

FIT Inspections

Business Services

$10,850

General

b

School Innovations & Achievement

State Mandate Compliance

Business Services

$30,600

General

c

Curriculum Associates

(i-Ready)

iReady software licenses for students and staff. Online diagnostic tools for math and reading.

Student & Family & Educational Services

$104,800

Supplemental Concentration Funds, Title I, YEP

d

Alison Pentland

Educational Services

$

e

Eden Area YMCA

To provide step, robotics, cooking and color guard to students who are registered in the YEP program.

Student & Family Services

$149,800

21st CCLC, ASSETS & ASES

f

Gurus Education

To provide speech and debate workshops to students registered in YEP at 3 HUSD High Schools.

Student & Family Services

$16,800

21st Century

g

Playworks

To provide workshops for the YEP staff to help provide an energized afterschool program supplemented by youth and afterschool components.

Student & Family Services

$10,050

ASES and 21st Century CCLC

h

Heinamann

Educational Services

$


 
Recommended Motion:
Approve the consultant contracts.
I.3.a. CSI: California School Inspections (Business Services) (Consent Item)
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION     

To present to the Board of Education, a contract to ratify for FIT Inspection Services in order to maintain compliance with Education Code §§ 17002, 17047 regarding school facilities’ “good repair” and rating.

HISTORY/BACKGROUND

The Eliezer Williams, et al., vs. State of California, et al. (Williams) case was filed as a class action in 2000 in San Francisco County Superior Court. The plaintiffs include nearly 100 San Francisco County students, who filed suit against the State of California and state education agencies, including the California Department of Education (CDE). The basis of the lawsuit was that the agencies failed to provide public school students with equal access to instructional materials, safe and decent school facilities, and qualified teachers. 

The case was settled in 2004, resulting in the state allocating $138 million in additional funding for standards-aligned instructional materials for schools in the first and second ranks (known as deciles) determined through the 2003 Academic Performance Index (API) Base. The settlement includes another $50 million for implementation costs and other oversight-related activities for schools in deciles one through three (2003 API Base). These two amounts were included in the state budget signed in July 2004 by Governor Schwarzenegger. The settlement was implemented through legislation adopted in August 2004: Senate Bill (SB) 6, SB 550, Assembly Bill (AB) 1550, AB 2727, and AB 3001.

As a result of the Williams case, the CDE instituted changes to the School Accountability Report Card (SARC) template that all schools must update and publish annually. The changes help all schools report the overall condition of their facilities, the number of teacher misassignments and vacant teacher positions, and the availability of textbooks or instructional materials.

Alameda County Office of Education has historically and randomly inspected and provided a report to Hayward Unified School District on the sites visited.  The District would report the findings on their SARCs.  Proactively, the District seeks to inspect all sites, establish preventative maintenance schedules and capital project projections from the findings and in accordance with standards set by statute and industry best practices.

The following comparison was solicited: 

Consultant/Contractor

Contract Term

Contract Amount

CSI: California School Inspections

3 years

Total: $32,550.00.

$10,850 annually

Dixon Smart School House LLC

1 year

$16,600.00 annually

Eric Hall & Associates

 

 

IMPLEMENTATION

An inspector will conduct one visual inspection of each school facility and take pictures of any applicable deficiency.  A draft report will be submitted to the District for review, and a final FIT will be submitted electronically thereafter.

 
Recommended Motion:

Ratify the contract for FIT Inspections between Hayward Unified School District and CSI: California School Inspections, LLC.


Actions:
Motion
Passed with a motion by Luis Reynoso and a second by Lisa Brunner.
Vote:
Yes Lisa Brunner.
Yes William McGee.
Yes Luis Reynoso.
Yes John Taylor.
Yes Annette Walker.
Attachments:
FIT Contract: California School Inspections
I.3.b. School Innovations & Achievement (Business Services) (Consent Item)
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION     

To present to the Board of Education, a contract to ratify for School Innovations & Achievement (SIA) in order to ensure and maintain compliance with the Mandate Block Grant Program.

HISTORY/BACKGROUND

For each fiscal year that a local educational agency (LEA) elects to receive block grant funding, it must submit a Mandate Block Grant Application which represents the Letter Requesting Funding.  Funds are allocated using average daily attendance (ADA) calculated as of the 2014-15 Second Principal Apportionment.  The 2015-16 MBG funding rates set forth in Item 6100-296-0001 of the 2015 Budget Act are as follows:

 

LEA

2014–15 P-2 ADA

Amount per ADA1

County Offices of Education (COE)

Grades K–8

$28.42

COE

Grades 9–12

$56.00

COE

Countywide2

$1.00

School Districts

Grades K–8

$28.42

School Districts

Grades 9–12

$56.00

Charter Schools

Grades K–8

$14.21

Charter Schools

Grades 9–12

$42.00

1 Rate is per unit of average daily attendance (ADA) calculated as of the 2014–15 Second Principal (P-2) Apportionment; if necessary, the rates may be proportionately reduced to stay with total available funding

2 Countywide ADA is defined as the aggregate number of units of ADA within the county attributable to all school districts for which the county superintendent of schools has jurisdiction pursuant to Section 1253 of the California Education Code, charter schools within the county, and the schools operated by the county superintendent of schools

Listings of eligible block and non-block grant programs are attached.

The most recent compliance contract the District held with Capitol Advisors since September 1, 2013 expired on June 30, 2015.  Services include: identifying and gathering documentation to support client applications, reviewing client applications, and advising and assisting with behavioral intervention plans. 

Consultant/Contractor

Contract Term

Contract Amount

School Innovations & Achievement

3 years

$30,600.00 annually

Capital Advisors “CodeChek”

3 years

$15,500.00 annually

Axiom

1 year

$9,100.00 annually

The most comprehensive scope was provided by School Innovations & Achievement to include the above application and filing services, as well as, interactive professional development, interim and annual reports, monitoring of District’s mandated cost tracking systems, representation with respect to any State audit of mandate reimbursement claims, and free access to the online publication Cabinet Report.  School Innovations & Achievement is also a well-established and reputable company that immediately aided the District in submitting Pertussis Claims for years 2011-2012, 2012-2013, 2013-2014 this past July 2015.  Capital Advisors whose contract expired June 30, 2014, with the District did not include prior year, late and amended mandate block grant filing, HUSD staff training, cost tracking assistance, and representation for State Controller Office audits in their quote.  Axiom only offered initial filings, reimbursement claims for non-block grants, and monitoring Commission decisions.

Moreover, School Innovations & Achievement recommended applying for non-block grant mandates projecting an increase to annual claims revenue between 26% - 89%. 

Hayward USD MGB vs. Limited Traditional Filing

2015/2016 Revenue Estimates

Block Grant only

 

Block Grant w/ SI&A filing claims outside of the block

Traditional Claims, limited mandates and claims outside of block w SI&A

Revenue

$689,494

$689,494

$1,127,325

Claims outside the block grant (includes Pertussis)

$0

$53,500

$53,500

Subtotal

$689,494

$742,994

$1,180,825

New claims outside the block grant* *if they are approved in 2015/16

$0

$124,000

$124,000

Grand Total

$689,494

$866,994

$1,304,825

IMPLEMENTATION

On August 25, 2015, the 2015-16 application due not later than August 31, 2015, was submitted to the California Department of Education (CDE).  The CDE anticipates that 100 percent of each LEA’s MBG will be paid in November 2015 to all LEAs that submitted the MBG Application.  The amount paid will equal 100 percent of each LEA’s entitlement. 

 
Recommended Motion:

Ratify the contract for Mandate Block Grant Program Compliance between Hayward Unified School District and School Innovations & Achievement.

Actions:
Motion
Passed with a motion by Luis Reynoso and a second by Lisa Brunner.
Vote:
Yes Lisa Brunner.
Yes William McGee.
Yes Luis Reynoso.
Yes John Taylor.
Yes Annette Walker.
Minutes:
The Board Trustees had the following questions/comments:
Q:
1. Do we have compliance workers in the district that monitor grants?
2. How have we done this in the past?
3. Do they monitor grants?
A:
1. This vendor helps us stay in compliance with mandates.
2. They have assisted us with monitoring mandates in the past.
3. No they do not.
Attachments:
State Mandate Compliance Contract - School Innovations and Achievement
I.3.c. Curriculum Associates (Student and Family Services & Educational Services) (Consent Item)
Actions:
Motion
Passed with a motion by Luis Reynoso and a second by Lisa Brunner.
Vote:
Yes Lisa Brunner.
No William McGee.
Yes Luis Reynoso.
Yes John Taylor.
Yes Annette Walker.
Minutes:
The Board Trustees had the following questions/comments:
Q:
1. What is the need?
2. What do you plan to do with it?
3. Who is implementing this?
4. Where is the buy in for teachers?
5. When can we expect an update on results?
6. How is this funded?
7. Title I is designed for Title I students not just YEP.
8. How many YEP students qualify for Title I funding in YEP?
9. These students will use chrome books?
A:
1. This is a computer adaptive assessment that allows us to target needs based on responses.
2. It will provide suggestions on lessons.
3. YEP - 4 schools. Staff will allow student access to do intervention to work on skills.
4. We are piloting at 4 schools and YEP as well. The teachers will be provided the information.
5. After second diagnostic, Spring time.
6. 80% Title 1
7. This is going to all students at these schools. An additional component will be offered at YEP.
8. All students qualify for Title I funding at a Title I site.
9. Yes
Attachments:
Curriculum Associates
I.3.d. Alison Pentland (Educational Services) (Consent Item)
Actions:
Motion
Passed with a motion by Luis Reynoso and a second by Lisa Brunner.
Vote:
Yes Lisa Brunner.
Yes William McGee.
Yes Luis Reynoso.
Yes John Taylor.
Yes Annette Walker.
Attachments:
alison
I.3.e. Eden Area YMCA (Student & Family Services) (Consent Item)
Actions:
Motion
Passed with a motion by Luis Reynoso and a second by Lisa Brunner.
Vote:
Yes Lisa Brunner.
Yes William McGee.
Yes Luis Reynoso.
Yes John Taylor.
Yes Annette Walker.
Attachments:
Eden Area YMCA
I.3.f. Gurus Education (Student & Family Services) (Consent Item)
Actions:
Motion
Passed with a motion by Luis Reynoso and a second by Lisa Brunner.
Vote:
Yes Lisa Brunner.
Yes William McGee.
Yes Luis Reynoso.
Yes John Taylor.
Yes Annette Walker.
Attachments:
Gurus Education
I.3.g. Playworks (Student & Family Services) (Consent Item)
Actions:
Motion
Passed with a motion by Luis Reynoso and a second by Lisa Brunner.
Vote:
Yes Lisa Brunner.
Yes William McGee.
Yes Luis Reynoso.
Yes John Taylor.
Yes Annette Walker.
Minutes:
The Board Trustees had the following questions/comments:
Q:
1. Is grant money being used for this training?
A:
1. Yes, that is correct.
Provide a list of vendors who provide training for YEP for the last 6 months.
Attachments:
Playworks
I.3.h. Heinemann (Educational Services) (Consent Item)
Minutes:
The Board Trustees had the following questions/comments:
Q:
Why is there is no information provided?
A:
1. This was an oversight. This is to add to our original contract to cover additional teachers that need to be trained.
Attachments:
Heinemann Amendment
I.4. Approve Memorandum of Understandings (MOU) (Consent Item)
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION

To present the following Memorandum of Understandings (MOU) to the Board of Education for approval. 

 

 

BACKGROUND

 

Vendor

Purpose

Div/Program

Amount/Fund

a

Eden ROP District Contracted Services

The ROP will provide leadership and coordination services and monitor programs to ensure that quality career technical standards are met and in compliance.

Business Services

No Cost

b

Eden ROP Transportation

The District has historically provided and qualified with a Memorandum of Understanding, Transportation Services with Eden Area ROP for students participating in the program from San Leandro, San Lorenzo, and Hayward Unified School Districts.

Business Services

No Cost

c

CSU – East Bay

CSUEB will provide University students to serve as interns in general education and special education

Educational Services

$10,000 – General Fund

d

ACOE IMSS

Integrated Middle School Science (IMSS) works with HUSD to implement, and study a comprehensive science professional development model designed to transform science teaching and learning in underperforming middle schools and build capacity to sustain the efforts beyond the period of the grant. The Alameda County Office of Education is identified as a core partner and subawardee of the grant to assist in its implementation.

Educational Services

No Cost

e

ACOE NGSS

Science Partnership for Instructional Innovators (SPFII) is a professional development partnership aimed at transforming science teaching and learning in predominately low-income schools serving underrepresented minority students and English language learners. The partnership targets teachers in the upper elementary and middle school grade bands for intensive and ongoing professional development while focusing on building organizational capacity within and amongst partners.

Educational Services

No Cost

f

California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC)

To provide a comprehensive environmental education program designed for middle school youth in the after school program using scientific tools and technology.

Student & Family Services

$0

g

Project Eden

Project Eden/Horizon Services, Inc. is a community based agency providing Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug (ATOD) services within our community and at several Hayward Unified Schools.

Student & Family Services

$0

h

Tiburcio Vazquez Health Center

To provide health school-based health center services at Tennyson and Hayward High Schools.

Student & Family Services

$4,000

Oral Policy Grants

i

AVID Amendment

Additional AVID training needed

Educational Services

$61,098 – previously Board approved for $52,698


 
Recommended Motion:
Approve the above Memorandum of Understandings (MOU).
Actions:
Motion
The Community needs to be aware that these programs are being offered at HUSD. Approve the Memorandum of Understandings Passed with a motion by Lisa Brunner and a second by Annette Walker.
Vote:
Yes Lisa Brunner.
Yes William McGee.
Yes Luis Reynoso.
Yes John Taylor.
Yes Annette Walker.
I.4.a. Eden ROP District Contracted Services (Business Services) (Consent Item)
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION

Consideration of a Memorandum of Understanding between Hayward Unified School District and Eden Area Regional Occupational Program (ROP) for Career/Occupational Training Programs for 2015-16, historically known as the District Contracted Program.

HISTORY/BACKGROUND

Each year, the District offers ROP programs at the high schools, and enters into an agreement with the Eden ROP that specifies the courses that have been approved and outlines the responsibilities of both the District and the ROP related to the District Contracted Program. 

The ROP provides funding to assist with the costs of the District Contracted Program, but such funding is not intended to cover the District’s full cost of the program.

IMPLEMENTATION

The ROP will provide leadership and coordination services and monitor programs to ensure that quality career technical standards are met and in compliance.

The ROP anticipates 25 sections and a cap of 193 ADA.  Revenue to be generated by the District is calculated at 75% of $2,933.33 per ADA plus $21,000.00 for career technician salaries to total $445,600.00.

 
Recommended Motion:

Approve the Memorandum of Understanding with Eden Area Regional Occupational Program (ROP) for Career/Occupational Training Programs for 2015-16.

Attachments:
Eden ROP - District Contracted Program
I.4.b. Eden ROP Transportation (Business Services) (Consent Item)
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION          

To present to the Governing Board, for review and approval, the final agreement between Hayward Unified School District (HUSD) and Eden Area Regional Occupational Program (EAROP) for transportation services for the 2015-16 school year.

HISTORY/BACKGROUND

The District has historically provided and qualified with a Memorandum of Understanding, Transportation Services with Eden Area ROP for students participating in the program from San Leandro, San Lorenzo, and Hayward Unified School Districts.

IMPLEMENTATION

The MOU defines the estimated annual mileage of 43,000 with service area estimates outlined on the MOU, by school district. EAROP will pay HUSD $322,515.00. Excess mileage above 43,000 will be invoiced at $7.50/mile.

 
Recommended Motion:
It is recommended that the Governing Board approve the Transportation Service Agreement between HUSD and EAROP for the 2015-16 school year. 
Attachments:
Eden ROP - 2015-16 Transportation
I.4.c. CSU-East Bay (Educational Services) (Consent Item)
Attachments:
CSUEB MOU
I.4.d. ACOE Integrated Middle School Science (IMSS) (Educational Services) (Consent Item)
Attachments:
imss
I.4.e. ACOE Next Generation Science Standards Grant (NGSS) (Educational Services) (Consent Item)
Attachments:
ngss
I.4.f. California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) (Student & Family Services) (Consent Item)
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION

To provide a comprehensive environmental education program designed for middle school youth in the after school program. Using scientific tools and technology, YEP middle school students in the Science Action Club (SAC) will carry out hands-on nature investigations, contribute to authentic research projects, and help scientists around the globe answer pressing questions about our planet. 

HISTORY/BACKGROUND

California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) will be working with YEP, to provide students with the opportunity to participate in the science action club’s and professional development for staff.  The Science Action Club Project is fully funded by Cal Academy of Science and the California School-Age Consortium. No cost to the YEP Program or general fund.

IMPLEMENTATION 

CalSAC will provide 24 hands-on environmental science activities to approximately 18-24 YEP students at Bret Harte, Cesar Chavez, Martin L. King Jr., Ochoa and Winton Middle School.  The Science Action Club will operate 2 days a week at all 5 comprehensive middle schools.  The program is led by a YEP Program Leader who will trained with the curriculum by a certified CalSAC trainer.  The club is to provide a unique opportunity for underserved middle school students to participate in a fun, educational science and environmental-oriented after school program that will spark their continued interest in STEM. 

 
Recommended Motion:

Approve the Memorandum of Understanding


Attachments:
CalSAC MOU
I.4.g. Project Eden (Student & Family Services) (Consent Item)
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION

The purpose the presentation is to present to the Board of Education the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Hayward Unified School District and Project Eden/Horizon Services, Inc.

HISTORY/BACKGROUND

Project Eden/Horizon Services, Inc. is a community based agency providing Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug (ATOD) services within our community and at several Hayward Unified Schools.  This agency has worked individually with sites and created opportunities for our secondary students to participate in education and prevention activities and to receive support around issues of tobacco, alcohol and other drug use.  In addition, Project Eden/Horizons Services, Inc. provides parent education workshops. This MOU is being brought forth to formalize our ongoing collaboration as well as to outline mutual commitments for the 2015-2016 school year. 

IMPLEMENTATION:

The implementation of this MOU will formalize the service delivery model at 6 secondary school sites, Bret Harte and Winton Middle Schools and Hayward, Tennyson, Mt Eden and Brenkwitz High Schools.

 
Recommended Motion:

Approve Memorandum of Understanding as recommended.

Attachments:
Project Eden MOU
I.4.h. Tiburcio Vasquez Health Center (Student & Family Services) (Consent Item)
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION

The purpose the presentation is to present to the Board of Education the memorandum of understanding between Hayward Unified School District, Tiburcio Vasquez Health Center, Inc. and the Alameda County Health Care Services Agency.

HISTORY/BACKGROUND

Tiburcio Vasquez  Health Center, Inc. has been collaborating with Hayward Unified School District and the Alameda County Health Services to provide school-based health center services at Tennyson High School and Hayward High School.  These services include health education, mental health care services, screening and referral services, treatment services, after school services and parent education.  These services have been a support to Tennyson High School and Hayward High School as they provide the much needed resources for students to overcome their barriers to learning. 

IMPLEMENTION

This MOU is an ongoing MOU to support the operations of the Health Center and all of its services.

 
Recommended Motion:

Approve Memorandum of Understanding as recommended.


Attachments:
TVHC MOU
I.4.i. AVID Amendment (Educational Services) (Consent Item)
Attachments:
avid amendment
I.5. Ratify School Site Council (SSC) Consultant Contract (Educational Services) (Consent Item)
I.5.a. UC Berkeley Social Studies & Science Project (Educational Services) (Consent Item)
Attachments:
UC Berkeley
I.6. Non-Public Schools (Educational Services) (Consent Item)
Rationale:

BACKGROUND:  

The IEP teams have determined these students require the services of a Non-Public School, based on their exceptional needs.

S U M M A R Y

Non-Public School                             Purpose                                              HUSD Cost                    

Devereux Florida                                Tuition and related services                $   180,083.96

Pine Hill School                                  Tuition and related services                $     53,622.00

Provo Canyon School                         Tuition and related services                $   125,840.00

Spectrum Center                                 Tuition and related services                $2,258,259.80

 
Recommended Motion:

Approve placements of students in Non-Public Schools

I.7. Key Academy Facility Use Ratification (Educational Services) (Consent Item)
Rationale:
PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION

The current site provided by HUSD is in-sufficient to house all of its enrollees. Additionally, the closing of FAME Charter in Fremont has brought more students to Key Academy.

HISTORY/BACKGROUND

Key Academy was granted approval of their Petition in 2013. The school is located at the  Markham campus, which shares the site with Faith Ringgold Elementary school.  For the 2014-15 school year Key Academy leased the Markham campus.  For the 2015-16 school year, Key Academy submitted a Prop 39 request to use District facilities.  However, the District does not have sufficient space to at Markham to serve all of the Key Academy students. 

IMPLEMENTATION

Key Academy Key Academy Charter School is asking to be able to add an additional facility in the Eden Area (but outside of the City of Hayward) to serve all of its students.  Key Academy has secured a 2nd site at the Epiphany Lutheran Church (16244/48 Carolyn St, San Leandro for the 2015-16 school year.  Key Academy would continue to occupy the Markham site per our Proposition 39 Agreement.  A more detailed explanation of the request is attached.  The Education Code allows for this additional site.  Since this is not considered a material change to the charter, it does not require that Key Academy resubmit a petition for Board approval. As HUSD does not have an additional facility to provide Key Academy, District administration has approved the use of the space.  The District is bringing this proposal forward for ratification so that the public is aware that Key Academy is operating a space outside of the District boundaries. 

 
Recommended Motion:

Ratify the use of a second site outside of District boundaries for Key Academy.

Attachments:
Key Academy Facility Use Ratification
I.8. Overnight Study Trip (Educational Services) (Consent Item)
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION

To present study trips for Board consideration.

HISTORY/BACKGROUND

a)  EldridgeOctober 22-23, 2015:  Fifty 5-6th grade students will participate in a history study trip on the U.S.S. Hornet in Alameda, California. Students will travel by private vehicles and be housed in bunk beds on the ship.  There will be 5 male chaperones and 9 female chaperones. Ray Lepinsky, teacher, is in charge of this trip.

IMPLEMENTATION

The cost for students is $70.  Fundraisers and donations will finance this trip.  No student will be denied participation due to lack of funds.  The event will take place Thursday, October 22 through Friday, October 23.

b)  Hayward HighFebruary 24-27, 2016:  One hundred 10-11th grade students will participate in a college tour in Northern California.  Students will travel by charter bus and be housed in a hotel.  There will be 5 male chaperones and 5 female chaperones. Lupe Santoya, counselor, is in charge of this trip.

IMPLEMENTATION

The cost for students is $200.  Puente and AVID funds and fundraisers will finance this trip.  No student will be denied participation due to lack of funds.  The event will take place Wednesday, February 24 through Saturday, February 27.

 
Recommended Motion:
Approve above mentioned study trips. 
I.9. Williams Complaint Update (Educational Services) (Consent Item)
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION

To provide information and an update on Williams Complaints.

HISTORY/BACKGROUND 

Williams Legislation requires quarterly reports to the H.U.S.D. Board of Trustees.  This Legislation calls for public schools statewide to provide equal access to qualified teachers, instructional materials, and campus facilities that are safe and in good condition. 

The eligibility list is required to be updated every 3 years.  The following sites are Williams’ schools based on their 2009 base API. 

Bowman

Longwood

Cesar Chavez

Cherryland

Lorin Eden

Winton

East Avenue

Palma Ceia

 

Eden Gardens

Park

 

Eldridge

Ruus

Hayward

Fariview

Schafer Park

Mt. Eden

Glassbrook

Strobridge 

Tennyson

Harder

Tyrrell 

 

 

No William’s complaints were received for this Quarterly Report

 
Recommended Motion:

This is an information item only

I.10. Adopt Board of Education Resolutions (Consent Item)
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION

The Governing Board is being presented with the following Resolutions:

  • Resolution 1516-07, Gann Amendment Limitation

  • Resolution 1516-08,  Adult Ed AB86 & AB104 Compliance

  • Resolution 1516-09, Suicide Prevention Awareness Month

 
Recommended Motion:

It is recommended that the Governing Board adopt the Board Resolutions.

I.10.a. Resolution 1516-07, GANN Amendment Limitation (Business Services) (Consent Item)
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION

To present to the Governing Board an annual update and required resolution regarding the Gann Limit calculation. This annual update is provided in conjunction with the Unaudited Actuals Financial Reporting and year end close process.

HISTORY/BACKGROUND

In 1978, California voters passed Proposition 13, which limited how much public agencies can collect in taxes. In 1979, the voters passed Proposition 4, commonly called the Gann Limit which determines the amount public agencies can spend from the proceeds of state and local taxes.

In September of each year, Education Code 42132 requires school districts to adopt a resolution identifying the actual appropriations limit for the prior year and the estimated limit for the forthcoming year. This resolution shall include the report used to calculate the limit and identify if an increase to the limit is required.

IMPLEMENTATION

The Gann Limit calculation is a supplemental report included in the Unaudited Actuals Financial Report (Form GANN). The District is not reporting an increase in its Gann Limit appropriation as reflected in Section D, line 10 of the Form GANN report.  Pending adoption of the resolution, this report will be submitted to the Alameda County of Office of Education as a component of the District’s 2014-15 Unaudited Actuals Report. 

 
Recommended Motion:

It is recommended that the Governing Board adopt Resolution 1516-07 declaring that appropriations in the budget for the 2014-15 and 2015-16 fiscal years do not exceed the limitations imposed by Proposition 4, Gann Amendment Limitation. 

Attachments:
2015-16 GANN Limit Calculation
Resolution 1516-07 GANN Amendment Limitation
I.10.b. Resolution 1516-08, Adult Ed AB86 & AB104 Compliance (Educational Services) (Consent Item)
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF RESOLUTION

HUSD needs to assign designee to ensure compliance with new law (Adult School funding)

HISTORY/BACKGROUND

According to Adult School reorganization, authorized via AB86 and AB104 (and the regulations that govern), the Hayward Unified School District designates, Dr. Guy ‘Zak’ Zakrevsky as our authorized representative to ensure compliance.

Dr. Zakrevsky has been our District’s Director of the Adult School for the past 2 years, and has been involved with the reorganization of Adult Schools (authorized under AB86 & AB104).

Adult Schools are organized (for funding and programs) within consortiums – created in conjunction with Community College Districts. The Adult Schools still operate under the jurisdiction of  local school districts, but funding is aligned to the consortiums (and distributed through the Chancellor’s Office of the Community College System).

A letter from the MACC (Mid-Alameda County Consortium) is included (outlining the regulations).

IMPLEMENTATION

Dr. Zakrevsky has been involved with the process for the past 2 years. This is a compliance requirement.


 
Recommended Motion:
 Adopt Resolution # 1516-08
Attachments:
Adult Ed Resolution
Board Designation Memo
Designation Letter
I.10.c. Resolution 1516-09, Suicide Prevention Awareness Month (Office of the Superintendent) (Consent Item)
Attachments:
Resolution 1516-09, Suicide Prevention Awareness Month
I.11. Adopt Board of Education Meeting Minutes (Office of the Superintendent) (Consent Item)
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION

The minutes of the following Board of Education Meeting is being presented for adoption.

  • August 12, 2015

IMPLEMENTATION

After adoption by the Board of Education, these minutes become the official record of actions taken by the Board of Education and are kept indefinitely.

 
Recommended Motion:

Adopt the minutes from the Board of Education Meeting.

I.11.a. August 12, 2015 (Consent Item)
Attachments:
August 12, 2015 BOE Minutes
J. ACTION/DISCUSSION ITEMS (Action Item)
J.1. Update on Bond Programs/Updated Demographic Study - Time Specific 7:15 pm (Business Services) (Discussion Item)
Time Certain:
7:15 PM
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION           

The purpose of this presentation is to give an update on the Bond programs (both Measure I and Measure L).  The second purpose is to present the updated Demographic Study, specifically as it relates to the community and Governing Board’s interest in potentially migrating to different grade span configurations (K-6, 6-8, K-8, K-5, etc.). 

HISTORY/BACKGROUND

Staff presented findings from the Demographic Study on January 30, 2013.  Also at the request of the Governing Board, on May 18, 2013, information and different scenarios focusing on the Board’s interest to potentially reconstitute HUSD elementary and middle school grade spans were presented.  On October 9, 2013, the Board discussed an update on the demographic and boundary study process and was interested in the discussion/project being revitalized in preparation for potential community meetings.  A demographics study is a planning tool used in conjunction with other information in a District’s decision-making process for future staffing and future facility needs analysis.   

IMPLEMENTATION:

Victor Lopez, Vanir Construction Management, Inc. will provide an update and projected timelines for Measure I and Measure L bond projects.

David Kaitz, Davis Demographics & Planning, Inc. will provide an updated Demographics Study. 

 
Recommended Motion:

It is recommended that the Governing Board receive for information the bond update and the updated Demographic Study.

Minutes:
The Board Trustees had the following questions/comments:
Q:
1. Are you the same company who did this for us in 2010?
2. Enrollment went up and countered what you said. Our base is different by 2,000. We are working with different numbers.
3. Is this for facility planning?
4. This report shows declining students. There should be actual attendance by areas.
5. Is this report updated?
6. What will next steps be? When will we get a new update?
7. Do you speak to the community?
A:
1. Yes
2. These are by residents, then by who actually attended.
3. The purpose is to show what is going on geographically. It is hard to predict enrollment.
4. On page 22 of the report you will see those numbers on the map.
5. This is based on last fall data. New data is received in October.
6. Draft-November or December, discuss with staff, sneak preview - January, then the final draft early February.
7. If the district requests it.
I feel like we are behind in demographics. We should have community meetings. Do we look at changing boundaries to reduce combo classes? What are the capacities of elementary schools? I don't have this information in this report. We need to focus on boundaries to reduce re-directs. When we start this process we need to look at boundaries and demographics.
Attachments:
2015 Demographic Report and Bond Update Presentations
2015-2021 Demographic Report on Student Population Projections
J.2. Adopt New/Deleted/Revised Board Policies & Board Bylaws (Office of the Superintendent) (Action Item)
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION

To present the following Board Bylaws & Policies to the Board of Education:

 

1

BP 0420.1

School-Based Program Coordination

17

BP 4243

Negotiations/Consultation

2

BP 0420

School Plans/Site Councils

18

BP 5111

Admission

3

BP 0440

District Technology Plan

19

BP 5113.1

Chronic Absence And Truancy

4

BP 0460

Local Control And Accountability Plan

20

BP 5125

Student Records

5

BP 0520.4

Quality Education Investment Schools

21

BP 5126

Awards For Achievement

6

BP 1240

Volunteer Assistance

22

BP 5131.2

Bullying

7

BP 1312.3

Uniform Complaint Procedures

23

BP 5141.4

Child Abuse Prevention And Reporting

8

BP 1340

Access To District Records

24

BP 5144.1

Suspension And Expulsion/Due Process

9

BP 3100

Budget

25

BP 5148

Child Care And Development

10

BP 3312

Contracts

26

BP 5148.2

Before/After School Programs

11

BP 4040

Employee Use of Technology

27

BP 5148.3

Preschool/Early Childhood Education

12

BP 4118

Suspension/Disciplinary Action

28

BP 6158

Independent Study

13

BP 4121

Temporary/Substitute Personnel

29

BP 6163.4

Student Use Of Technology

14

BP 4131

Staff Development

30

BP 6170.1

Transitional Kindergarten

15

BP 4143

Negotiations/Consultation

31

BP 6174

Education For English Language Learners

16

BP 4231

Staff Development

32

BB 9124

Education For English Language Learners

 

HISTORY/BACKGROUND

California School Board Association (CSBA) submits recommended updates and revisions to current Board Bylaws and Board Policies to meet state and federal laws and regulations. 

 
Recommended Motion:

Approve revisions of the Board Policies & Bylaws presented to the Board of Education.

Actions:
Motion
Approve all except for Board Bylaw 9124. Table this item for clarification and language. Passed with a motion by Lisa Brunner and a second by Annette Walker.
Vote:
Yes Lisa Brunner.
Yes William McGee.
Yes Luis Reynoso.
Yes John Taylor.
Yes Annette Walker.
Minutes:
The Board Trustees had the following questions/comments:
Q:
1. What if I have a question on a conflict of interest. Such as I have questions on a job outside that may be a conflict on me being a Board member?
2. If I go to the Board President I should be granted access.
3. What can we add to give access to legal? We gave the Superintendent plenty of suggestions to word this.
4. What verbiage can we put in place to give us access? We spend way more money at conference and should continue to be safe, confident being board members.
A:
1. This is a personal issue, not a board issue.
2. As worded or 3 people need to say yes (majority of the board).
3. Controls are put in place to protect the Board. I represent the Board and as your lawyer I provided a legal opinion to the Superintendent that went out to the Board Trustees.
4. The existing concept is the "gate keeper" approach. You could add by the Board President or majority of the board.
CSBA does not run anything.
The Superintendent is not an elected official.
We paid legal to answer our question and she did. A legal opinion was sent to us. We are not paying you to write our policy, that is our job. We need to adhere to laws.
Issues came up when a Trustee asked and was denied. Then told they can only do it via writing.
We violated someone's first amendment rights.
Attachments:
Board Policies & Board Bylaws
J.3. 2015 Summer School Update (Educational Services & Student and Family Services) (Discussion Item)
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION         

Provide an update on HUSD summer academies and programs offered in 2015.

HISTORY/BACKGROUND

Hayward Unified School District’s summer programs and academies provided a variety of learning opportunities for students.  This summer HUSD was able to provide a coordinated, comprehensive, student-focused experience.. 

Summer School Programs Update

In the attached presentation, we provide information on the following:

  • High School Credit Recovery

  • EL Academy

  • K-3 Literacy Academy

  • Early Childhood Programs

  • HPN Programs

  • YEP

 
Recommended Motion:
This update is for informational purposes only.  
Actions:
Motion
Tabled Passed with a motion by Luis Reynoso and a second by Lisa Brunner.
Vote:
Yes Lisa Brunner.
Yes William McGee.
Yes Luis Reynoso.
Yes John Taylor.
Yes Annette Walker.
Attachments:
summer school
J.4. CAASPP Update (Educational Services) (Discussion Item)
Rationale:

BACKGROUND

During the 2014-15 the State of California implemented the first California Assessment of Student Progress and Performance (CAASPP).  This is the new assessment based on the Common Core standards.  On September 9, 2015 the CDE released the results of the CAASPP.  These results establish the baseline for student performance in meeting Common Core standards.

PRESENTATION

The purpose of this presentation is to discuss the following …

  • Provide an overview of the CAASPP assessment and how it works

  • Explain the new reporting system

  • Share an initial analysis of CAASPP results

As the CAASPP results were just publicly released, a more detailed analysis will follow. 


 
Recommended Motion:
This is for informational purposes only. 
Actions:
Motion
Tabled Passed with a motion by Lisa Brunner and a second by William McGee.
Vote:
Yes Lisa Brunner.
Yes William McGee.
Yes Luis Reynoso.
Yes John Taylor.
Yes Annette Walker.
Attachments:
caaspp
J.5. FY 2014-15 Unaudited Actuals Financial Report (Business Services) (Action Item)
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION

The Unaudited Actuals report has been prepared in accordance with Education Code Section 41010 and is being presented for review and acceptance.

HISTORY/BACKGROUND

The District is required to close it books for the fiscal year and submit its financial statements to the Alameda County Office of Education (ACOE) in September.  After review, the ACOE will forward the report to the California Department of Education (CDE). 

The report is prepared using the CDE’s required Standardized Account Code Structure (SACS) financial statement reporting format.   The Unaudited Actuals reports the District’s actual financial activity for the 2014-15 fiscal year, and the District’s beginning fund and cash balances for the 2015-16 year.

IMPLEMENTATION

The Unaudited Actuals Report will be submitted to the ACOE by September 17, 2015 for the required review and submission to the CDE by October 15, 2015. The report will be audited by the District’s independent auditor in September 2015, and the final Audited Financial Report will be presented to the Governing Board in January 2016.

 
Recommended Motion:

It is recommended that the Governing Board review and accept the 2014-15 Unaudited Actuals financial report as presented.

Actions:
Motion
Passed with a motion by Luis Reynoso and a second by Lisa Brunner.
Vote:
Yes Lisa Brunner.
Yes William McGee.
Yes Luis Reynoso.
Yes John Taylor.
Yes Annette Walker.
Minutes:
The Board Trustees had the following questions/comments:
Q:
1. Clarify ending balance on page 9. Are we negative?
2. What would it look like if we added another $500,000 to Adult Ed? Please provide and in the loop.
3. Add line to separate Admin expenses and teachers. Coordinate with years going back. Can you provide a trend on administrators cost?
4. Food Services why are they in the red?
5. Is the engagement letter for auditors approved by the Board?
A:
1. No
2. I will provide this information in an in the loop memo.
3. I will provide this information in an in the loop memo.
4. They are positive and are not in the red.
5. No
Why can't we do that here? We need control back. auditors need to report to us. I want the Board to get control back.
Attachments:
FY 2014-15 Unaudited Actuals Financial Report
J.6. Donations (Business Services) (Action Item)
Rationale:

PURPOSE OF PRESENTATION     

The Board of Education appreciates, and would like to acknowledge, the generosity of parents and the community.

HISTORY/BACKGROUND

Many parents and community members donate items to benefit the students of Hayward Unified School District. Individual schools will forward the donation information to the Board of Education so that a formal acknowledgement may be made at the meetings and a letter of appreciation can be composed.

IMPLEMENTATION

Accept donations as follows:

DONOR

ITEM

VALUE

SITE

Alumni Anonymous Donation

Cash

$10,000

Hayward High School Football

 

 
Recommended Motion:

Accept this generous donation. A letter of thanks will be sent to the donor by members of the Board of Education.

Actions:
Motion
Passed with a motion by William McGee and a second by Annette Walker.
Vote:
Yes Lisa Brunner.
Yes William McGee.
Yes Luis Reynoso.
Yes John Taylor.
Yes Annette Walker.
K. BOARD CORRESPONDENCE REPORT (Procedural Item)
L. RETURN TO PUBLIC COMMENTS (Procedural Item)
M. FUTURE MEETING DATES (Procedural Item)
Rationale:

Regular Meetings are held at Hayward City Hall, 2nd Floor Council Chambers
777 B Street, Hayward, CA 
5:00 p.m. (CLOSED SESSION) 
6:30 p.m. (OPEN SESSION) 

Upcoming Meetings: 
Wednesday, September 30, 2015 
Wednesday, October 14, 2015

 
N. RETURNING AGENDA ITEMS (Procedural Item)
O. ADJOURNMENT (Procedural Item)
Minutes:
The Board Trustees adjourned to Closed Session at 10:56 p.m.
The Board Trustees reconvened to Open Session at 11:26 p.m.
No actions were taken during Closed Session.

The meeting adjourned at 11:27 p.m.
Prepared by Rosemary Rivas for Stanley Dobbs,
Superintendent/CEO and Secretary to the Board of Education
9/16/2015 5:02:00 PM ( Original )
PresentLisa Brunner
PresentWilliam McGee
PresentLuis Reynoso
PresentJohn Taylor
PresentAnnette Walker

The resubmit was successful.